How to deepen a semi-remote creekbed?

RarrarMarch 21, 2011

Here's the situation:

We have this land with a small creek running through it. It's all wooded and there are paths, and it's beautiful, and there are three small waterfall-type areas in the creek. Ten years ago, the best of the three was at least ten feet high, from the top of the slate creekbed up above to the rocks under the water, and even the tallest could stand under there for a lovely little shower. There were even fish down below!

Since then, though, this crevasse with slate walls has gradually filled with rocks from farther up the creek, so that it's now only about 5 feet from top to bottom, and only wading and wettening of the hips are easy. I want to basically dig it out. It would be removing 5-7 vertical feet of layered rocks and creekbed from a channel about 3 feet wide and 20-30 feet long.

By hand, a massive undertaking, lots of heavy lifting, time, and possible injury. No heavy machinery, 'cause it's inaccessible (and would mess up the woods anyway). Possibly some sort of simple water-powered device. How can I do this? My thought have been:

1. Use an adjustable dam sort of thing, with 4x4's holding the water back. Let it get high, and then release it all. Repeat and lower the damming apparatus as needed. This would just use the built up water to wash the stones downstream. Maybe no place for them to go very far?

2. Waterwheel attached to some sort of a screw mechanism or scoop to push rocks downstream. Where to get a big funky screw like that? What kind of machine could I just construct and leave there to do its work?

Any suggestions would be much appreciated.

Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
mad_gallica(zone 5 - eastern New York)

Do you know anybody with draft horses?

    Bookmark   March 21, 2011 at 7:30PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
woodyoak zone 5 Canada

Even with horses, someone would have to do a lot of physical labour.... I'd go for one of those Bobcat (or whatever they're called locally...) things - they're small and not too heavy. One of those would probably be able to get in there without too much damage, as long as there's a reasonable track/trail that would take one there. You'd better give some thought to what you're going to do with/where you'll put the rocks etc. You don't want to just cause a bigger problem downstream somewhere on your own or someone elses' property.

    Bookmark   March 22, 2011 at 3:29PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
inkognito

Leave it as it is and have another look in 2016, who knows....

    Bookmark   March 23, 2011 at 5:18PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
nandina(8b)

The old timers would have dealt with this situation using a match and a stick of dynamite. My familiarity with the glacial topography Of NYS and the various types/layers of shale leads me to observe that nothing is static in a glacial field with moving water. Best to leave all alone and watch the changing stream through the years.

    Bookmark   March 24, 2011 at 8:43AM
Sign Up to comment
More Discussions
Layout for backyard near house - suggestions
We are wanting to improve on our backyard and create...
lyfia
Landscape advice for front yard please!
We have just moved into a house in SoCal - zone 10...
glitzalicious
Spacing for Armstrong Maple and Crimson Spire Oak
I plan to provide height to the borders of my backyard...
Bob Sislow
Where to find 3/8" minus gravel in NY/NJ??
Our community garden is planning to rehabilitate our...
heavens123
Do any of you see any red flags with this design?
We got a landscape design for our new yard that we...
TyBarr
People viewed this after searching for:
© 2015 Houzz Inc. Houzz® The new way to design your home™