Coconut husk chips vs Pine bark fines...

jsvand5June 23, 2008

Would CHC's work better long term than pine bark fines? I have a few tropical fruit tree's that I am getting ready to pot up and was thinking of using 1/3 CHC, 1/3 turface, and 1/3 jungle growth potting mix. Seems like it would last longer with the CHC's rather that the fines to me. Can you think of any negatives to this or any suggested improvements? Also, what size CHC would be best?

Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
justaguy2(5)

I am sure Al will be along before too long, he has used CHCs and not been too impressed as I recall, however in general plants seem to grow poorly in them according to studies. Even peat moss seems to produce healthier plants.

Dunno if it is because they need to be fertilized differently or what, but I have looked at CHCs casually and pretty much written them off.

    Bookmark   June 23, 2008 at 2:55PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
jsvand5

Glad I read this before I placed my order. Do you know of an online company that sells Pine bark fines. I can't seem to find them locally.

    Bookmark   June 23, 2008 at 3:53PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
jsvand5

I am planting mango trees, and will be keeping them in the same container for a long time. Would the 1/3 bark fines, 1/3 turface, and 1/3 crushed granite be the best choice? Is the below pic the same as pine bark fines? I found this labeled as pine mulch and was wondering if it would work? It looks to be a good size, but I am not sure if it is thick enough (if the thickness even matters.)Any tips on places to look for the crushed granite or an acceptable substitute? I can't seem to find it anywhere.

    Bookmark   June 23, 2008 at 4:46PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
tapla (mid-MI z5b-6a)

From what I've studied, there is little difference in the decomposition rates of CHCs vs pine/fir bark, and coir vs peat, so I wouldn't allow durability or longevity of the (soil) components sway my decision to use a coconut product or not.

After being pressed by a dear friend to try/evaluate CHC's, I performed a little experiment. Below, is a copy/paste job from a post I left somewhere, earlier this year. Though it starts out talking about coir, it ends with some commentary about CHCs.

Sphagnum peat and coir have nearly identical water retention curves. They both retain about 90-95% of their volume in water at saturation and release it over approximately the same curve until they both lock water up so tightly it's unavailable for plant uptake at about 30-33% saturation. Coir actually has less loft than sphagnum peat, and therefore, less aeration. Because of this propensity, coir should be used in mixes at lower %s than peat. Because of the tendency to compact, in the greenhouse industry, coir is primarily used in containers in sub-irrigation (bottom-watering) situations. Many sources produce coir that is high in soluble salts, so this can also be an issue.
Using coir or CHCs as the primary component of soils virtually eliminates lime or dolomitic lime as a Ca source because of their high pH (6+). Gypsum should be used as a Ca source, which helps correct coir and CHC's low S content. All coconut products are very high in K, very low in Ca, and have a potentially high Mn content, which can interfere with the uptake of Fe.

I haven't tested coir, but I have done some testing of CHCs (coconut husk chips) with some loose controls in place. After very thoroughly leaching and rinsing the chips several times, I made a 5:1:1 soil of pine bark:peat:perlite (which I know to be very productive) and a 5:1:1 mix of CHCs:peat:perlite. I planted 6 cuttings of snapdragon and 6 cuttings of Coleus (each from the same plant to help reduce genetic influences) in containers (same size/shape) of the different soils. I added dolomitic lime to the bark soil and gypsum to the CHC soil. After the cuttings struck, I eliminated all but the three strongest in each of the 4 containers. I watered each container with a weak solution of MG 12-4-8 with STEM added at each watering, and watered on an 'as needed basis', not on a schedule. The only difference in the fertilizer regimen was the fact that I included a small amount of MgSO4 (Epsom salts) to provide MG (the dolomitic lime in the bark soil contained the MG, while the gypsum (CaSO4) in the CHC soil did not. This difference was necessary because of the high pH of CHCs and coir.) for the CHC soil.

The results were startling. In both cases, the cuttings grown in the CHC's exhibited only about 1/2 the biomass at summer's end as the plants in the bark mix.

I just find it very difficult for a solid case to be made (aside from "It works for me") for the use of coir or CHC's. They're more expensive and more difficult to use effectively. The fact that some believe peat is in short supply (no where near true, btw) is easily offset by the effect of the carbon footprint of coir in its trek to the US from Sri Lanka or other exotic locales.

That's the view from here.

Al

    Bookmark   June 23, 2008 at 6:11PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
jsvand5

Al, would the pine bark in the above pic be ok to use? I am not quite clear on what is considered a "fine"?

    Bookmark   June 23, 2008 at 6:44PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
jsvand5

In your 1/3,1/3,1/3 mix what is the purpose of the crushed granite?

    Bookmark   June 23, 2008 at 8:47PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
jsvand5

I think I have everything I need now. I think I am just going to order a bale of uncomposted fir bark online. I want this mix to pretty much last indefinitely so I assume the uncomposted fir bark will be better than what is pictured above?
I'm in a horse country in Ocala fl so the grani-grit was an easy find once I found out it could be bought at a feed store.

    Bookmark   June 23, 2008 at 10:05PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
tapla (mid-MI z5b-6a)

The bark in the mix looks quite coarse for the 5:1:1 mix where it would be the primary component. It's closer to suitable in the gritty (equal parts) mix where it would be a component, secondary to other parts of roughly equal size, but still much larger than I would use myself. It also has a large portion of its volume in sapwood (>20%, by the look of it). The ideal bark for the 5:1:1 mix would be in size dust to 3/8, with the bulk of the particles in the 1/16-3/16 size range. For the gritty (equal parts) mix, the ideal bark would have little dust & the bulk of the particles should be in the 1/8 - 5/16 size range. I know that's being pretty picky, but as long as we're talking 'ideal' here .....

In the equal parts mix, the granite and Turface are used to control the water holding ability of the soil. Increase Turface & decrease granite = a more water-retentive soil. Decreasing Turface and increasing granite = a less water-retentive soil.

Al

    Bookmark   June 23, 2008 at 10:07PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
justaguy2(5)

Al, would the pine bark in the above pic be ok to use? I am not quite clear on what is considered a "fine"?

Hard to say without a size reference in the pic. Think half the size of a dime or smaller for most purposes. The purpose of granite in a mix is drainage. Granite doesn't hold any water. Bark holds quite a bit, more as it starts to decompose. Turface also holds a lot of water. I will probably have to repot my new citrus trees that are in 1 part bark fines, 1 part Turface as the mix continues to hold water too long even though summer temps have arrived.

    Bookmark   June 23, 2008 at 10:11PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
jsvand5

Yea, I kind of figured that would not work. I'll just break down and order a bale of fine fir bark from an orchid supply company. When switching trees from the nursery pot to your 1/3,1/3,1/3 mix do you remove all of the nursery soil from the roots?

    Bookmark   June 23, 2008 at 10:36PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
tapla (mid-MI z5b-6a)

You need to consider timing when you do a repot (as opposed to potting up). You can't just bare-root a plant in full leaf & expect it to react favorably. That treatment, for instance, would kill a high % of woody deciduous material. You don't mention where you live (important info), but it may be prudent to simply pot-up now and nurse your mangos through until late winter & repot then, before the main push in spring.

Al

    Bookmark   June 23, 2008 at 11:29PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
jsvand5

I am in FL so I may be better off waiting until winter. I think when the mango's arrive I will just pot them up with the mix I have been using (Jungle growth potting mix, the pine bark pictured above and perilite) and go with your mix in the winter. My other mango's and lychee's have been growing very well in the above mix. I am just looking for something a little more stable.

    Bookmark   June 23, 2008 at 11:49PM
Sign Up to comment
More Discussions
Type of kale... Also, shiny metallic flakes?
Hey, my friend gave me some kale seeds from her plants...
Josie Murray
Pine Bark Fines Substitute?
I'm having trouble finding pine bark fines for the...
johnweh
Help with 5:1:1
Some lol-basic questions about quantities needed for...
containergardenerbeginner
To find popular threads try this...
When you are looking for popular threads from the GW...
Loveplants2 8b Virginia Beach, Virginia
Al and others..Foliage Pro fertilizer?
I just wanted to get an update on what you think of...
meyermike_1micha
People viewed this after searching for:
© 2015 Houzz Inc. Houzz® The new way to design your home™