Water Plant

jekeesl (south-central Arkansas)(7b)December 11, 2012

These plants were only 2-3 inches across. Leaves had 3 leaflets on long petioles. Leaflets were round, with notched tips, and about 0.25 inch across. The plants were in a small waterway that was less than 2 inches deep. They were almost entirely submerged.

Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
hortster(6a, southcentral KS)

You might compare it to Desmodium triflorum. Native to warm, high rainfall areas. Not sure if it grows IN water, though.
hortster

    Bookmark   December 11, 2012 at 4:08PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
flora_uk(SW UK 8/9)

To me it looks a lot like some sort of trefoil such as one of the Medicagos. M lupulina looks similar. I don't know what would be likely in your region.

    Bookmark   December 11, 2012 at 4:20PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
lycopus(z5 NY)

I suspect that it's a terrestrial plant that became established during a dry period. Medicago lupulina is a definite possibility.

    Bookmark   December 11, 2012 at 5:27PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
thedecoguy

I'd go along with the Lesser yellow trefoil.

    Bookmark   December 11, 2012 at 5:33PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
jekeesl (south-central Arkansas)(7b)

I worked through a few possibilities, and no golden tickets yet. Desmodium triflorum has leaflets with the right shape, but the plants are too hairy and the leaflets don't have those lateral veins. And online sources suggest that it needs a warmer, wetter climate than available here. Medicago lupulina leaves have much shorter petioles, and the plants are too hairy. Medicago polymorpha is interesting, since it is a less hairy plant and has those long petioles. But the leaves should be more heavily toothed toward their tips. Trifolium campestre and Trifolium dubium seem wrong - too hairy and leaves on fairly short petioles.

Lycopus makes a good point - the plant may have been established during our summer drought, so may not be an aquatic species.

When I cropped the photos, I did see that leaflets had about 5 pairs of lateral veins. The leaves also had leafy bracts at their base, which were not yet fully developed. Finally, all plant parts appeared to be glabrous.

If you have more ideas, I'll happily check them out. But I'm starting to suspect that these may be developing plants that are not yet in their final form.

Thanks for the input.

    Bookmark   December 11, 2012 at 10:07PM
Thank you for reporting this comment. Undo
fatamorgana2121

If I saw it growing here, I would think Medicago lupulina.

I was on a hike this past weekend where the focus was on the changes to the ecology of an area immediately surrounding a reservoir pond (or lake in some parts of the country!) that had been partially drained to repair damage to a retaining wall. The plants that opportunistically moved into the very fertile areas that used to be under water were quite amazing. Plants do find a way!

FataMorgana

    Bookmark   December 12, 2012 at 3:05PM
Sign Up to comment
More Discussions
Who knows what type of orchid this is?
I keep getting these "Unusual Plant" emails....
Scooby D. Labbé
Identifying Plant
Any help identifying this plant would be appreciated....
Sari Lomax
Mini "weed" growing in a pot ID
Pot was outdoors all summer. Growing in a pot indoors...
true_blue
Help to identify this truly silver shrub please
This is growing in a south facing front garden. Partially...
amyrodwyer
Are you sure you want to leave this page?
For the past day, I've been seeing this message every...
jekeesl (south-central Arkansas)
People viewed this after searching for:
© 2015 Houzz Inc. Houzz® The new way to design your home™