|
| It looks I reached the maximum number of posts on the original thread, so I'll repeat my question here:
I have a questions concerning mulching the beds....I'm assuming I need to remove the sod from the beds and then lay mulch, correct? How do we handle the transition between the redbuds and beauty bushes and the firepit area (mulch to stone/crushed brick)? Any other tips when it comes to mulching? |
Follow-Up Postings:
|
| Perhaps the two of you should continue the conversation privately. |
|
| To handle choosing two separate mediums for mulch without them mixing will require a divider of some sort. Plastic edging is often used to separate a bed from grass. It's approximately 6 inches high and has a thickened top. If you were to look at it from the side it looks like a lollipop but comes in various lenghts. The bottom portion goes into the ground and the lip sits on top helping to keep various mediums separated. Can be purchased at any box store. It can be a tripping hazard if used the way I think your looking to do A better and more attractive way to separate the different mediums would be to put down a stone path the length of the area you want to separate. A picture of the area would be helpful if I've misunderstood your needs. Scott |
|
| As far as existing sod in the future bed areas is concerned, by far the easiest way to deal with it is spray kill it with herbicide once you have the bed edges marked out. Leave it in place and just cover it with mulch in a couple of weeks. You would set the edging at the proper level to contain the lawn and just bring mulch to the top (or nearly) of it on the landscape bed side... which means excavating a little of the bed area near the edge. You'd toss the excavated part further back into the bed area. You might fade an excavation back 2' or so into the bed. It's actually quite common to do this same thing using no purchased edging at all. In that case the mulch meets the vertical cut edge of the lawn. |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Tue, Mar 27, 12 at 8:34
| That's exactly what I was looking for Yardvaark (I was going to dig up all the sod). Any specific herbicide I should use (I don't want to kill the trees and may need to plant in areas where I'll have already sprayed the herbicide)? Any other tips as I don't want to harm the trees? |
|
| Use an herbicide which is non-residual such as Roundup or similar, taking care to apply it on a windless day or protect tree trunks so they don't get accidentally sprayed. If you're dealing with more resistant types of grass such as St Augustine or Bermuda grass it may take more than one application for complete kill. |
|
- Posted by patty_cakes (My Page) on Sat, Apr 28, 12 at 0:24
| Pmsmith, my landscaping 'guy' thought the best thing would be to dig up ALL the St. Augustine, if that's what you have. Since it was my whole back yard I wanted to do away with, using Round-up was out of the question~3 young, strong guys did it all in about 5 hours. I honestly wouldn't waste the money unless u can get a 2for1 deal on the Round-up. Maybe you have a couple of high school boys who would like to earn a little extra money as well as get in shape during the summer. ;o) Sounds like you're doing pretty much the same as me~~several beds are what i'm going for, so am also doing various mediums for mulch. Have you considered crushed limestone or pea gravel? Now I need to find you're original post! |
|
| Nononono limestone or pea gravel! Pine bark is great. Do that. :-) |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Thu, May 10, 12 at 15:31
| Hi everyone. Just thought I'd check-in and give an update on the backyard landscaping project I had posted on a few months ago. First, here is a picture of the design we are using for those of you not familiar with our project: Here is our progress and some observations (hopefully they can help others): 1. We have planted all trees and shrubs with the exception of the Annabelle hydrangea. The beautybush we ordered died but are going to be replaced by the vendor. One of the river birch (planted in groups of 3) also died and will be replaced down the road. 2. We spread two truckloads of mulch (total of 20 yards). I rented a sod cutter before we spread it but now have found new grass is still coming up through the mulch. I am just spot killing the new grass with roundup. Looking back, it probably would have been best to kill all grass with roundup first. 3. We used balsams for the area where "spruces" are designated and a viburnum where bottlebrush buckeye is designated. We also planted balsams along the back of the yard between the pool and fence. We know they will have to be moved or cut down but haven't made a final decision on this area yet. 4. We have begun building the deck which is placed on the southwest corner of the pool. 5. Japanese maple leaves were severly damaged by frost/freezes but new ones seem to be regrowing. This seems to be the most sensative of the trees we planted. I will post pictures in the next few days! I also wanted to thank again everyone that helped us with advice and plants! We've learned so much from this site! Finally, as many of you know, I always have new questions. On that note, does anyone have any suggestions on perennials to incorporate in the plan? Thanks as always! |
|
| Smitty, good to hear from you! I was wondering how your project was coming along and it sounds like you're making progress. Am surprised you are as far along as you are. Hope some of it has been FUN...not just all work! So this is the plan you finally came up with? It looks remarkably like the how-to-draw-a-plan example I submitted! Well, pay your money and take your chances, I guess. : ) It is not abnormal for emerging leaves to be killed by a late frost. Most plants carry right on. I'm curious, besides the areas that were unresolved, did there turn out to be areas that are a problem for one reason or another? There are so many great perennials. I'd start with some of the tried and true and expand afterward into anything your heart desires. Some great basic ones are: Hybrid or fancy Daylilies (Hemerocallis) I was going to put asterisk by the ones that are "must have," but it would be all of them. Will give Russian Sage a double asterisk for its dramatic abilities. I'd find a place for every single one even if it's just temporary. In the next two years you can move them to where they're best suited after you get a chance to appraise their performance and abilities. (You will need to create some of the places for them.) Grass by the pool: you might start with Miscanthus sinensis, either 'Gracillimus' or 'Morning Light', and also get a start of 'Strictus' or 'Zebrinus'
|
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Fri, May 11, 12 at 8:49
|
| I envisioned the bed line on the side (where the Birch trees are) to be a little more fluid feeling. (See my picture below.) But whether it's worth changing is something I can't say. What you have may work fine for you; I can't see the overall of how it ties in with the rest of the yard . (If you altered it, you'd need to alter the Birch placement.) Since you have weeds/grass coming up, it's a blessing that you don't have groundcover in the way of the Roundup treatments. But soon... during the summer if you can water it regularly, or maybe in the fall if you can't, you'll want to install some groundcover. Eventually, the mulch will wear thin and invite more weeds if there is not groundcover already smothering out their attempts to invade. It's hard to see many of the plants so not much comment for those. To the left of deck (as facing it from the back yard) it looks like the shrubs (Hydrangea) may be too close to the house wall. Their centers should be between 2' - 3' off the wall (uniformly, of course.) If the Potentilla in the same vicinity is running at an angle (as it appears) I'd straighten it up in line with the deck. If you're trying to round the lines out a bit, I'd do it instead with the addition of perennials filling in the corner space. |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Fri, May 11, 12 at 11:50
| Here's a more detailed recap of issues/observations area by area: 1. North lot line - River birch were planted in 7 clumps of three trees each. The clump that is to the furthest southwest position (front left in picture above) was a transplant from another area in the yard. It has been growing for 4 years or so (ordered as bare-root 2'), is approximately 7' tall, and is by far the fullest clump. The other two southmost clumps (hard to see but closest clumps in above picture) were bought a month ago as 2' bare-root. The 4 northmost clumps are comprised of two 2' bare root trees each and one donated tree each from Kevin. The donated trees are VERY tall (approximately 30' tall). One of them just died, but the other three are doing well. These donated trees are rather bare of leaves (especially down low) but I imagine they will fill in next year now that they are not in a "forest-type" environment. I know that I have a widely varied size/maturity of birches, and not sure how/when to prune to create a more uniformed look. 2. North lot line (Japanese Maples) - Kevin donated a beautiful Japanese maple that, like I said previously, was affected by the frost/freezes. It seems to be getting new leaves now. There is room for another Japanese maple which we still need to buy (I would imagine we need to wait until next spring now). 3. North lot line (Pogoda Dogwood) - Seems to be doing well. The leaves were slightly affected by the cold but seem to be okay otherwise. 4. Northeast corner. We moved the swingset slightly away from the fence and turned it. We planted two Oakleaf hydrangea on either side of the three trees in the back corner and they seem to be doing well. They are a bit sparse/tall but I'd imagine they'll fill over time? We ended up planting three different trees in the back corner (burr oak, red oak and hickory) because they were donated. 5. East lot line - Three balsam were planted in the area designated as "Spruce". They are about 2' tall and don't have the greatest shape (transplants from northern Wisconsin) but I'd imagine we can prune them as they grow. We planted two 4' Viburnum in a clump where Bottlebrush Buckeye were specified. It needs to be moved as spacing isn't correct but I'd imagine we should wait until next spring? Balsams were then planted in the area between the pool and fence. We planted them temporarily in case all the transplants didn't survive. We haven't decided if we'll leave them but understand that they will eventually have to be moved, or cut down when they get to be too big. 6. Pool deck - We decided to place the pool deck on the south west corner of the pool. It will run 16' from north to south (about half way across pool) and 12' east to west (most of that length will extend out into the yard. 7. South lot line - The area between the pool and south lot line is open and will eventually have solar panels located there. The beautybush we ordered online died but will be replaced. It probably is for the best as their placement may have to be tweaked once the deck is finished. Not sure how they will be placed as we don't want them blocking access beween fence and the deck (10-12' away from fence). The firepit area hasn't been started and may have to wait until next year. The area does seem kind of small so we'll have to see once the deck is finished. 8. Southwest corner - One mature redbud was donated and planted and is doing well. Six 2' bare root redbuds were ordered and planted and are growing. I'm still not happy with the spacing so I may need to make some modifications. 9. Deck area - Two Endless Summer hydrangeas were planted in the area designated as "Big Leaf Hydrangea" (south of deck along foundation). Three Goldfinger potentillas were planted along the south side of deck, one at the southeast corner (to the south of the stairs) three along the east side of the deck, and three to the north of the deck (along foundation leaving approximately 7' for two Annabelle hydrangea next to deck). The hibiscus bush was planted in the nook just to the north of the staircase (designated where a small tree could be planted in the design above). Three Sensation lilacs were planted along the north side of the deck. The serviceberry was tranplanted to the northeast corner of the house. I think that pretty much sums up our progress. Thanks as always for all the help! |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Fri, May 11, 12 at 12:00
| Thanks Yardvaark. If we changed the lines of the birch bed, how would place the trees? Is it too late in the year to move them now? If I remeber correctly, I planted the hydrangea approximately 22" from the foundation. That was assuming they would reach the 3'-4' width size the tag said. The potentilla are 20" or so from deck and 3' apart. The first two (back two in the picture) are the same distance from the deck. The third is a bit closer as I was trying to create a rounded affect coming around the corner. I will take more pictures and measurements of the areas you mentioned. Thanks again! |
|
| 1. "I know that I have a widely varied size/maturity of birches, and not sure how/when to prune to create a more uniformed look." Don't bother doing anything for it this year. Just let them grow and develop strength. At the end of the next dormant season is when you'll prune... according to what you have and where you want to go. A good picture after they've grown and next become dormant will get you some advice. 2. You can buy and plant the Jap maple anytime you can find it in a container or already balled and burlapped. You'll need to provide water until it's established. If the Jap. maples are in a grouping you'll need to find one that matches what you have. 4. "We ended up planting three different trees in the back corner (burr oak, red oak and hickory) because they were donated." Well, it's way at the back and who will care if you don't? 5. Sure, you can trim Spruce for shape as they grow. You can transplant Viburnums anytime during the dormant season when the ground isn't frozen. Fall or Spring. I like Fall because roots still grow even while the top is dormant. 8. If you want to change redbud spacing, wait until fall. Within a year or two, as things develop and grow and you finish up your existing projects, you'll find it much easier tighten up the direction that brings it all home. Nice job on getting this far! I'd put some thrust into developing groundcover so you are not looking at a sea of weatherbeaten mulch next year. If you are undecided about groundcover plants, you would do well to get samples of the various contenders. Install anywhere just for observation and to learn the plants. Knowing their personalities will make deciding the winners easier. |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Sat, May 12, 12 at 9:22
| Thanks Yardvaark! Sounds like maybe we should be concentrating on groundcover as opposed to perennials as we are on a limited budget at this point? If so, can you suggest a handful of plants that would be good options for groundcover? I'm going to Menards today and wanted to check some out. |
|
| Nearly any of the above mentioned perennials could do duty as groundcover in smaller areas and where some height is desired. Suit plant to conditions. A popular large scale groundcover plant because of it's mostly evergreen nature and winter color is Euonymus fortunei 'Coloratus', aka wintercreeper. 12" height. Sun or shade, but best color in sun. There is a similar variegated version. A cheap, easy, deciduous groundcover is Virginia creeper. 10" ht. Japanese Painted Fern... shade, 12" (+) Low groundcovers could be... If something in particular at Menards attracts you, mention it here for feedback. Of course, there are more than what I've mentioned. Maybe someone else will toss out some suggestions. Research the details of any that you consider to see if the plant's personality suits your goals. |
|
- Posted by oceandweller 8B (My Page) on Sat, May 12, 12 at 13:37
| Evergreen trees, evergreen trees, evergreen trees due to your neighboors all having two story houses. I would go to the local nursery and ask what grows really well in your area and would grow fast to the 30-50 foot range for the back and 30ish for the sides, and put 5-7 across the back. I would also probably throw in a fast growing red maple variety or two across the back for color and place near and in front of the evergreen so you get the color and in winter get the green. I would just about forget groundcover and would really focus on the trees for privacy. |
|
- Posted by oceandweller 8B (My Page) on Sat, May 12, 12 at 13:38
| I forgot to add I would place the large evergreens right in the path from the neighbors windows in line of sight to your house, that way you can barely see your neighbors house and windows, it will give you a ton of privacy that way. |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Mon, May 14, 12 at 9:59
| Any opinion on using Dianthus Firewitch as a border around the beds? What are the blooming characteristics of Firewitch and what kind of spacing would you recommed? |
|
| While my love for plants and gardening began in childhood, my interest in landscaping did not begin until adulthood. During the years before it began it's almost as if the things I saw in the landscape, I only saw with peripheral vision. At that time, I was tolerant of anything that looked "pretty". My very first actual attempt at landscaping (as an "enthusiast" before any schooling, studying, learning about it or gaining experience) was to line each side of a walk with a skinny bed of (too tall) annuals. In retrospect, I consider this to be one of the most atrociously despicable things that a person can do in the name of landscaping. However, I would not learn that until some time later. It was during ensuing years that I observed that almost always, a narrow "line" of any plant (used like a necklace) never looked as good as a solid, wide bed of the same plant. So the idea of narrow lines of plants used as "edging" consistently rub me the wrong way. Out in the real world there are many bad ideas that are considered to be completely normal and acceptable and "edging" beds with a line of plants (even alternated ones) is one of them. Rather than giving a professional look, to me, it gives a fussy, "old lady-ish" look. And it adds more maintenance to the work schedule. If the "edging" is w i d e , it begins to take on an acceptable character. I don't have time right now, but I wanted to show you how you could subdivide groundcover areas to add more interest. It will not be in opposition to the idea that continuity is important. Though there are trees and shrubs planted, they are small and barely visible in the photos. It mostly looks like a yard of mulch. Obviously, the goal is not to feature a yard of mulch in future years. It's just where owners determined they needed to start in order to make things work with the budget. It will require patience to see results and depending on how it shakes out, some plant replacements and some additions may be needed later. Nevertheless, getting started with groundcover will be important unless the owner wants to add a lot more mulch for top-dressing in the future. This is a great time to explore and test groundcover possibilities. Learning how to propagate some plants (easy) from one's own stock can save a terrific amount of money. I installed a quarter acre of ivy in my own yard. It didn't cost me anything but a little time. |
|
| Forgot to mention about the blooming characteristics of 'Fire witch'. I love that blue-green, vigorous, mowed-lawn-like mat of foliage... and even the dazzlingly bright bloom. It's good for a 3-week blast and maybe a little recurrent bloom later. But be careful how you use it. It is so bright and powerful, that it can give a "Candyland"-like appearance. It should be the necktie, not the suit. |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Wed, May 16, 12 at 9:06
| Thanks oceandweller. Unfortunately due to space (our backyard is only 100'x 80' approximately) and the pool (27' round) space for large conifers is limited (we want to maintain a decent sized grassy area for kids to play in). Also, we like the "northwoods" feeling created by planting "layers' of trees. I have done some shopping, and so far have purchased the following perennials: coneflowers (purple "Magnus" and Powwow Wild Berry), dwarf coreopsis (Coreopsis auriculata), "Little Business" daylily, Black-eyed Susan "Goldstrum", Astible (red and pink), liatris (25 bulbs) and red lilies (10 bulbs). We also have two large clumps of salvia (each approximately 20" wide) growing in a back corner which we will move and yellow daylilies (I think 'Stella De Oro') growing in front which we can divide. We plan on planting in clumps of three plants each. We would like to work on planting in the beds along the back deck (along back of house) first. We are struggling with placement and spacing (don't want to block hydrangeas and potentillas). I have also found a woman who is selling the following: WOODLAND NATIVES Celandine Poppy OTHER SHADE PLANTS Hosta - many varieties including the miniatures SUN PLANTS: Nepeta - Catmint 35 varieties of daylilies 38 varieties of iris (miniature, Siberian, and bearded) Groundcover Bugleweed Ajuga Not sure what is good and bad on this list but would appreciate any suggestions on what I should look at when I go to see her and where it might fit in to our plan. Thanks as always! |
|
| A lot of the plants that are in your long list (if they don't show up in the previous list) are not so much landscape material as they are gardening material. Experiment with any buy obtaining a sample and observing its characteristics over a year or two. Some may be useful. Others not. Be more specific about the "spacing" questions. What and where exactly? |
|
- Posted by adriennemb z3/4 (My Page) on Wed, May 16, 12 at 11:50
| Hmm, you have a lot of my favourites on there... In those shady woodlands areas, you can't beat hostas and astilbe. Bugle weed too is beautiful, both foliage and flowers, but is a rather vigourous groundcover. And although you don't have it on the list, have you considered colombine, bleeding heart and of course ferns? There are a billion types of bellflowers - I prefer the smaller, clumping variety but they all have a long or recurrent bloom time, love nestling in semi-shaded rocks and are self-propagating. As for the sun-loving plants that you've listed, I find that veronica is overall a better looking plant than salvia. Like veronica, catmint will rebloom if you cut them back after the first flush. Coreopsis is a great meadowland type flower that tends to look rather weedy when not in bloom. There are so many types of sedum, all of which do great in drier, well drained areas of the yard. Their best showcase in a northern garden is often beside walkways. Daylilies are terrific when at their peak but you have to continually cut off the spent flowers to keep them looking tidy. Irises are strictly late spring/early summer, so make sure that the variety you pick has foliage that you like for the remainder of the season. Spiderwort too is much the same as the irises - I've had to give up on it in a mixed bed garden though because I keep mistaking it for clumps of grass and weeding them out ;" The bees love monarda. They spread by runner and will pop up in unexpected places. If you like these flowers for their wildlife attractant value, you absolutely have to make room for Joe Pye weed - 6 foot tall (but sturdy) beautiful perennial flowers that amazingly die back to the ground each winter. A smaller plant with a similar flower head, acslepias, is an absolute must to attract monarch butterflies to the yard. The caterpillars will devour the leaves, leaving just the bloom and the cocoons behind but wow... in a few weeks, your yard will be alive with butterflies. So cool. And my absolute favourite are johnny-jump-ups and violas. Such cheerful, brave little faces. The first to come in the spring, disappearing in summer only to re-emerge in the fall. And once you have planted them, you truly never know where they will "jump up" again the next year. |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Wed, May 16, 12 at 12:00
| Thanks Yardvaark. When I referred to spacing, I mean how far different species of perennials should be planted from each other (I have found spacing recommendations of same species online)? One of my concerns/struggles is creating a stepped looked of perennials (tallest in back, shortest in front). For example, from the list you provided, I would imagine coneflowers and liatris would be planted in the back (tallest) and coreopsis would be planted in front (smallest) with the rest of your suggestion in between. Wouldn't the coneflowers and liatris block the hydrangea and potentillas in back? As for groundcover, you had mentioned groups, or large clumps, of same species together. For example, if we were to plant purple wintercreeper around the river birches, how large of an area would we ant to cover? |
|
| What must be taken into account with perennials is that they go through phases. Determining where they go, and how, is based on their performance through most of the growing season. That's why, the best thing to do with perennials is to get a bunch of them and observe their habits over a year or two to figure out where and how they best fit in. Liatris, for example has almost grass-like foliage that is only a few inches high through most of the growing season. But when it blooms for a fairly lengthy time period (let's say 3 or 4 weeks from start to finish) it sends up flower spikes that are 2' or 2 1/2' tall. But they're not like a thick, solid mass. So if they stick up in front of something for a few weeks, it's not really going to block what's behind and then, and then, shortly thereafter, they'll be finished blooming. It is the constant changes that makes gardening intriguing and time consuming to learn. A plant cannot be understood just by seeing it in a pot at the garden center. Do the basic research about each plant as far as it's foliage and bloom height and make your best, educated guess, as to where exactly it should fit in. You understand the general concept of tall at back transcending to shorter in front. As you learn (over the next couple of years) you will need to make some adjustments, but eventually, you'll see that it will become orderly. It's fun discovering two plants that look spectacular together and then working them into an awesome display. If you want a rule of thumb about perennial spacing, figure that somewhere between 18" to 24" will be reasonably safe. But as there is a HUGE range of perennials, this range cannot work for everything. But don't worry, you really can't make a mistake than can't be fixed. (Especially, since you are a transplanting expert!) And the agony of transplanting is all the drive you need as a stimulus to learn how to avoid it. Also, don't worry about something being blocked in it's "baby", immature state. Worry only about it in it's mature, fully grown state. |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Wed, Nov 7, 12 at 22:56
|
| Smitty, good of you to post the pictures. With all the bare root material you put in it looks like a good amount survived. After they go through the winter, then during the next growing season you'll probably see growth that is much beyond anything you saw during the first summer. Winter is great for plants! The plants are still small enough that it's hard to grasp their impact or meaning. It will take more time for us to be able to to see them. One thing I can see coming up is that where there are like plants in a group (3 redbud for example) you'll want to have it so that they all look like closely related brothers in a family (same form.) You won't want one to be a single trunk and 2 to be multi-trunk or some other such combination. But working on that is something for Spring, just before new growth pops out. We can re-visit that then. What we also want to see now is a good picture of that finished pool deck (...not just a snippet!) |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Thu, Nov 8, 12 at 11:53
| Thanks Yardvaark! It was an extremely dry and hot summer so we did experience some losses. About half of the Potentilla died, the bigleaf hydrangea were constantly wilting, the beauty bushes did not do well, the one Japanese maple did not make it, most of the balsams died, and one of the oaks did not make it. I would say we had a 75% survival rate. A couple of questions: 1. Do I just cut all the dead growth off on the perennials (purple coneflowers, black-eyed susans, etc) I will take some pictures of the deck and a couple pictures from the second story to show the bed layouts this weekend. |
|
| In general, you can cut off dead growth anytime it doesn't look good. (Sometimes dead flowers and leaves--like on grasses--look great.) I would wait to prune the Birches until just before they go into growth mode. Sometimes, cutting before winter seems to invite drying and dieback. Just to be safe, I'd wait. Don't know what Hibiscus you have but, in general, allow things to freeze and then mulch well. If it's tropical, it could/should become a house plant for the winter. A "bulb" could be something to be lifted and stored in a cool place... or left in place and mulched. You need to know what it is so you can do the right thing. See if you can find out. |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Thu, Nov 8, 12 at 12:42
| The name of the hibiscus is "Hibiscus Fireball - Perennial Hibiscus ". |
|
| That one is perennial. Let the soil freeze then mulch well. After last frost in spring, reduce mulch to the normal level to help soil warm up. |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Mon, Jan 14, 13 at 10:45
| I was able to get out this past Saturday (it was close to 50 degrees) and take a few pictures of our pool deck: |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Mon, Jan 14, 13 at 16:55
|
| Nice follow-up. I suggest doing quite a bit of research on pruning techniques. You might get more info for links on the trees or shrubs forums. There are too many techniques and species to discuss in this thread. In the first year or two typically you want only remove dead, diseased or rubbing branches. You have a nice diversity but there is alot of pruning that needs to be done in multiple phases starting in year 2 or 3. |
|
| I agree; it's good of you to update so progress can be seen. Nice job on the deck. It looks like high quality construction. Very handsome! Most pruning advice come from a horticultural viewpoint as opposed to a landscape viewpoint. It's self-centered from the plant's perspective with little thought about how the plant fits into the creation of a larger display. You're on the right track as far as wanting like plants that are grouped together to behave in a similar fashion. Ditto on not being concerned with flowering. Plenty will come later. It's helpful to know a couple of basic concepts of pruning. When a stem is cut back, it will usually encourage branching from the remaining portion of the stem. Where one stem was, several others will sprout. Likewise, cutting one "trunk" might turn it into 2 to 5 trunks. This is highly variable and depends to a large extent on the particular species and other conditions as to how many sprouts pop up to take the place of the one cut. This is the method that is used to "thicken up" branching (or "trunking" or "twigging") on a plant. The converse process is that of thinning, where side branches (or trunks or twigs) are entirely removed from a main member in order to obtain less thickened growth. These two processes may be used to obtain the exact thickness or thinness of branching (or "trunking" or "twigging") of the plant one desires. Another major factor in creating the form of a tree would be the angle of spread of the trunk system. In the nursery, young plants, while the wood it highly flexible and form-able, are often tied to support systems in order to grow plants of uniform angle of trunk spread. Homeowners sometimes prefer to just pick the trunks that are growing most where and how desired and remove the rest. Another factor that determines the form of a tree is how much clear trunk (the portion without any side branching) is permitted. Obviously, one cannot create 8' of clear trunk on an infant tree that is only 4' in height. Clear trunk can only be increased as is permitted by the overall height of the tree. While there are many opinions about how much clear trunk a tree should have and how it should be created, the general rule of thumb I use is up to 50% of the total plant height. If done BEFORE the spring flush of growth, the branch removal results in regrowth at the upper portions of the tree. It may return to a 60% canopy vs. 40% clear trunk, or something along those lines after the spring flush of growth is completed. Later in the year it will probably be even more canopy-heavy. Pruning in anticipation of what is to come is better in my opinion than reactionary pruning, which is what most people do. It's physically easier and there is less of a scar to heal on the plant. If a plant is to be in the shrub form, no clear trunk is desired or produced. Many woody plants can be grown as shrubs or trees and it is their owners who decide what form will work best as the plant is, above all, in the service of man. It's not up to the plant to decide, but plants do have their "preferences" which determine how much they are willing to cooperate. Those that sprout innumerable "trunks" or sucker prolifically would not be easy to make into tree forms ... unless one is after some sort of grove effect. Those that tend toward sparse trunks and leggy (branch-free) growth would not easily make good shrubs. Sometimes, plants balk at whatever it is one decides for them, but over the course of time (with ongoing insistence) may become cooperative. It depends. Woody plants are better if trunks and branches do not begin on one side of the plant and cross over to the other side. It's bad form that, when visible, appears messy on trees and shrubs whenever the trunks are exposed to view. Even if hidden in foliage canopies it can sometimes lead to a disfigured appearance if heavy pruning is called for at a later time. As one example, I would advise you to prune the river birches so as to make the most uniform appearance of the group. (While they may be of different size today, it's not likely to be noticeable after a few years, so you can ignore the difference for now.) While it's true that you could get away with doing nothing for a year or two and then catch up later, I would suggest making the obvious corrections now so as not to pay a higher price down the road. You'll need to decide what you think is the superior appearance for the species. (While most river birch are commonly grown in trunk clusters of 3-4 trunks, when I see 5-7 trunk clusters--since a primary reason for growing them is the bark--to me they seem superior, displaying more bark and offering a heftier stature. Decide what is your idea of optimum and work toward that.) For the trunk spread try to envision a cone shape (narrower at bottom) that the trunks will fit within. In order to maintain a uniform trunk spread, remove those that fall outside of the imagined cone and allow the best (of what number you decide) to remain within. You can use training devices--stakes, tying, etc.--while the wood is young and flexible, if it makes it easier. In your tree "A" below--which I think has the best presentation of the lot--at this time (anytime before the spring flush of growth) I'd remove only the trunk portion which appears to be crossing from the left side, through the center and over to the right side. Trees "B" and "D" seem to have a single trunk that is substantially larger than any other. While it might seem drastic, I'd remove those large trunks, cut to 6", and divert their growth energy into regrowth and into the smaller trunks. This will result in more uniform trunk size overall. It's likely that the trunk removed will still produce the largest trunks, but it will be 3 or so, not just one. Since there is such disparity, if you allow the large trunks to remain it's likely that they will shade the shorter trunks and slow their growth enough to prevent their catching up. Not all that much later, the removal of the larger trunks will be unnoticeable. It will probably be next year that you could concern yourself with removing extra trunks. For now, they could contribute to feeding the plant. By then, it's likely that some would advance over others and make their own "suggestions" about which should stay and which should be removed. At tree "C" there is not enough growth to warrant doing anything. Just feed and water during the growing season to encourage more growth. I doubt if occasional watering of deciduous trees during the winter will amount to much but neither would it be likely to hurt anything. Evergreens might appreciate it if the soil is dry and the ground isn't frozen solid.) I would give the wilting hydrangeas more time. Some plants have a difficult time getting adjusted. If plants wilt, don't automatically give them more water. If the soil is already damp and watering is frequent, the roots can rot which will cause never-ending wilt. Water according to the moisture condition of the soil, not the wilting condition of the plant. For new plants, sometimes you might need to offer some temporary shade for which something simple can be rigged. |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Tue, Jan 15, 13 at 13:47
| Thanks Whaas and Yardvaark! A few follow up questions: 1. Provided a tree was growing and healthy at the end of last summer/fall, it is okay to prune this spring? 2. What is the best time to prune? Can I prune now? Wait until February or March? 3. Do the redbuds need to be pruned at all? Some of the branches seem pretty low but I'm thinking I should wait another year to see how they develop? Thoughts? 4. Just to clarify, I should cut the main, tall river birches (20-25' tall) all the way down to the ground, down to 6", or down to 6'? And I would just leave all the remaining shoots or stems around the tall trees until next year? There is a smaller birch (8'-10') in the groups on the far right and far left (they were transplants)...cut those down too? 5. Just leave the serviceberry, dogwood and vibernium as is for this year? They are all shrubs I think so they are suppose to have multiple stems, correct? 6. Should the oakleaf hydrangeas be cut down to a certain height? Shouldn't they be more "bushy"? 7. Trim the low branches on the oaks and hickory (they are almost at ground level)? Thanks again! |
|
| 1. A tree that is growing and healthy at the end of last summer/fall is okay to be pruned in the spring. 2. The best time to prune for major shaping and sizing is in the dormant season before the spring flush of growth. (Some people think that the closer to spring it is, the less likelihood of die-back from the cut area there will be.) But many pruning operations can occur during the growing season ... especially if you are trying to reduce size or limit growth. With pruning, most people are concerned about mistakenly cutting off the next batch of blooms. For plants that produce bloom on the previous season's growth ("old wood") prune as soon after flowering as possible so that there is time for next year's flower buds to form. It's the spring flowering woody plants that usually fall into this category. Research plants individually to see if they flower on new wood or old. 3. You'll need to decide if you want to grow the Redbuds as single trunk or multi-trunk trees. (If it was my yard, I would do multi.) They are small and new enough that you could do nothing this year but let them produce as many leaves as possible, trying to develop strength and vigor. 4. With the River Birches, I'm basically saying REMOVE the tall, single trunk that is seriously way ahead of any other potential trunks in their respective groups. If there were 5 similar trunks (or how many you want) in a group, I would not say to do this! "Remove" means to cut to 6 inches height. Leave all the remaining potential trunks; they can be sorted next year. 5. The serviceberry, dogwood and vibernium are all shrubs (I think that's what you are deciding) so are supposed to have multiple stems. Basically, check them for cross-over wood and give a light shaping, if needed. They may be too young to discern a shape so next year would be fine for doing that. If any are to be in the tree form you'll do the same plus some limbing up. 6. Make sure the oakleaf hydrangeas have light, water and fertilizer and they will become bushy on their own. You can cut the height if it's taller than you wish it to be. Otherwise, not really needed. When new stems form, you can remove the old one if it has a bad appearance. 7. Yes, trim the low branches on the oaks and hickory. |
|
| YV was definitely more generous with his time! The only other points I'd offer is that some species are considered "bleeders". Although its ok to prune them in winter and spring you are best pruning in late spring/early summer or even in fall after they go dormant. But I still have issues during that time for larger cuts. These species include maple, yellowwood and riverbirch. There are others. Further more there are some species that you shouldn't prune in early spring/early summer. For example Red oak due to the beetle that spreads oak wilt. You can go multi-stem or single stem on the river birch. Now is the time to decide which route you want to go. |
|
| Whaas, your birches and the shrubs below look nice ... and healthy. Wondering about the "bleeding" you mention ... are you referring to the temporary (but sometimes seemingly lengthy) oozing of fluid after a cut, or an ongoing chronic condition that develops because of it? After various pruning over the years I've seen weeping that goes on for several days, but it has never appeared to do any actual damage or resulted in any lasting effect ... that I could see anyway. Is there conclusive evidence that it's a real danger to some species? Or is it just "alarming?" |
|
| There are a lot of ways you can improve the privacy to your backyard. You can use trees and bushes..there are many types that flower or can even grow quickly. |
Here is a link that might be useful: Landscaping
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Mon, Jan 21, 13 at 10:10
| Thanks for all the great advice Whaas and Yardvaark! Waas....out of curiosity, do you know the name of the bushes/perennials under the two river birch pictures you posted above (I'm just trying to get ideas of what to plant under ours)? I know last year there was some concern about the shape of the beds around the river birch groves. I took some pictures this past weekend to show the actual outline/layout (I would like to make adjustments this spring if needed): Thanks as always for everyone's help! |
|
| To me, it was the flat spot and abrupt turn on the bed line that seemed a little out of character for the overall space. |
|
| I really like that simple line change yard suggested! Yard Pm |
|
| Whaas, thanks for clarifying about the bleeding. Makes sense. |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Thu, Jan 24, 13 at 9:38
| Much appreciated Yardvaark and whaas. I've done some research and decided on trying winter sowing some perennials, groundcover and ornamental grasses to try and get a good start for spring. Also, we decided to scrap the solar panel idea for the pool and will probably be planting grasses around the back (east) and side (south) of the pool. The deck position has changed since Yardvaark's design above so we have a lot more room to work with in the area between the pool and fence on the south side. Thanks again! |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Tue, Feb 19, 13 at 9:46
|
| Woody plants for sure don't stop growing at that "magical height," but in a way, perennials do. At least they get into the magic height ball park and don't stray much from that zone. You might look at 'Skyrocket' Juniper for the backdrop of the pool area. They're tough. And narrow. Also, explore Miscanthus grasses. Some of them get quite large and look quite lovely in a poolside setting. I'd consider finding the Jap Maple and Beauty Bush locally in containers. Sometimes, bare root through the mail can by "iffy." If one is experienced and can be reasonably certain of the quality they're getting, and if plants are hard to find locally, then there's a good reason to use mail order. But if there's difficulties, I'd shop locally first. Here in Florida, even the big box stores carry an amazing variety of plants and the prices are (usually) reasonable. If there are other nurseries and garden centers around, you might check them out. It depends on how much a person wants something as to how much they're willing to pay, but for the most part, many plants are inexpensive. I know for a fact that some of the plants you lost grow well there and are not terribly difficult (especially Beauty Bush!) Another consideration, If you're having difficulty getting whole groups of plants to grow and the plants are known to do well in your area, I double check to make sure they are not being planted too deeply. You also mention a hot and dry summer. As the plant's daddy, you must provide for all it's needs. You can't let them croak because of lack of water. If that's the case, it wouldn't matter what plant you install. They'd all die young if water wasn't available on time. |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Thu, Feb 21, 13 at 15:03
| Thanks Yardvaark. Well try both the JM and Beauty bush again this fall. Besides perennials and groundcover, our plan is pretty well set with the exception of around the pool. We'll definitely use the 'Skyrocket' Junipers and Miscanthus grasses along the two sides of the pool. What are your thoughts for the back corner (southeast)? I am thinking a smaller bush or tree? Something shorter like a couple of viburnums or fothergilla? We don't need a lot of height (10' to 12') and it's a pretty large area to fill with Junipers or grasses. Maybe a wider Juniper or Arborvitae? I am worried about leaves and shade in the pool but since we've never had a pool before it's hard to gauge the disadvantages. |
|
| It's been too long and I've forgotten and I'm too lazy to go see which direction is SE. Is it R or L as you face the back yard from the deck? |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Thu, Feb 21, 13 at 18:59
| It is the right corner if facing the backyard standing on the back deck. It's the corner behind the pool (opposite the playset). |
|
| To me, the words "tree" and "shrub" do not indicate a plant's size but mean only its form. A tree is limbed up (with some portion of clear trunk(s) and a shrub has foliage all the way to the ground. I'm thinking that whatever is at the perimeter will be in the shrub form as you're interested in screening at that location. I would lean toward having the tallest material at the corner of the lot and descend in height farther away (with the scheme and arrangement depending on the plant material chosen.) Why wouldn't you want to use the Skyrocket Juniper screen to bound the corner and then use lower height material elsewhere? If you use a small tree in the corner also (or elsewhere, but next to the Juniper, you'd shade out the Juniper where they're close and that wouldn't be pretty for the Juniper. They need full sun to retain foliage. If you shade out a portion of Juniper, the plant that shades it must also do the work of covering up/screening the defoliated portion. I guess I'm not quite understanding the arrangement that you're hoping for ... how trees/shrubs work together. I like the idea of Juniper bounding the corner because there is not shade and leaves to overhang the pool, yet there is screening from the adjacent lots and late afternoon sun (if you arrange it that way.) Maybe describe what you're trying to achieve and we could go from there. |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Thu, Feb 21, 13 at 20:55
| I think I understand better now. I could place jupiters or aborvitaes in the corner and then have grasses extending down the back and side fenceline along the pool, correct? |
|
| Yes. Down the line. And some grasses (or other plants) could also fill space between pool & Junipers (or whatever) if there is space to be filled. Not sure how much room you will have between pool & junipers. |
|
- Posted by oceandweller 8B (My Page) on Thu, Feb 28, 13 at 14:39
| Yall really mistook my information as planting a large row of evergreens... That landscaping in the neighborhood is so barren as a whole, it just doesn't look natural at all. If yall can't see the fact that there are at least a couple of missing evergreen trees in all those landscapes then I am at a loss. Your backyard neighboor appears to have 5 maples with no spacing and an entire grass backyard lol I think it funny yall are looking at perinneals when the only true problem I see is the privacy and lack of trees. Rather than focus on perinneals or groundcovers, why not go out and find a tree farm and get a couple of really nice large evergreens, like a couple of spruces, firs, hemlocks, pines, etc. Then I would plant things like a couple of holly or arborviate. To me it seems what you need to most is wind blocking "to me it looks like that backyard would get insanely cold in zn 5, and I mean insanely with that picket fence and no trees in the neighboorhood. While I like yardvarks design its pretty expensive, not saying you couldn't do it in steps, but its a pretty big job. It would be 10x easier to go get a two 10 foot large evergreen you like, pick out 4-5 smaller evergreens, like a dwarf blue spruce etc. and put those in front of the larger trees and call it a day. Not trying to freak you out or anything but almost seems like you have perfect visibility into 3-5 homes without privacy at all, the only way you'd change that is by placing two 30-40+ft evergreens strategically placed to block the sight of the neighbors houses "eventually", your lot appears to be easily large enough. |
|
| "...[Yardvaark's design] its pretty expensive..." Oceandweller, just curious, what aspect of the design do you see as the expensive part? From my view, the most expensive part looks like the mulch. Don't know if you've viewed this thread from the beginning, but the OP has trees to install as well as installed ones to grow. He opts to put in small material and do it over time. (It looks like the neighbors are on the same program.) Doing what works for one's circumstances is so much better than not doing it ... as many people do. The plan was submitted as a pictorial guide--example--of how to draw a plan. Nothing more. |
|
- Posted by oceandweller 8B (My Page) on Tue, Mar 5, 13 at 14:06
| Well on the basis of how to draw a plan, most people on here are not quite as hypothetical, needing real issues solved. The title on that basis is quite misleading, in being privacy. Obviously, there is a lack of privacy to just about any designer that would view it. I also feel there is a lack of continuity between the individual yards. I also apologize, it was pmsmiths design. It is very similar to something I would draw up though the OP has stated he didn't have a large yard nor want a lot trees because of leaf shed with the pool. It is easy to be confused in such a large thread. I would look into grasses and red twig dogwoods if your not big on litter in the pool, try and find stuff that will block the wind in larger evergreens and then nothing deciduous over 15 ft basically free from pool leaf litter. Thats all... Being so far north spring and fall will take care of itself, I would focus a ton on winter windbreak and color, and recommended annuals and perineeals for summer color rather than trees to be added at a later date, it to me is essentially a blank canvas. Sure, you could do it in small parts with a lot of trees and landscaping, or you could get 2-3 evergreens that grow fairly large as a basis and get them in, then work from biggest to smallest to represent the scale of the house, thats how I would do it on a budget. You will also get the most bang for your $ that way. |
|
| Oceandweller, this is actually a thread of nearly 210 posts. The first thread filled up so it was continued on this second one. There was a considerable amount of tangential discussion along the way and a good bit of information trading. The front yard was totally separate and did not become introduced (in a separate thread) until the back yard thread was well along the way in its direction. The plan for the back yard was mine and submitted for the purpose of illustrating what kind of things would be shown in a planting plan, as a guide for the OP. I think he was content that it was usable (since it was 100% based on his yard and nearly to scale) so decided to adopt it as "the" plan (though he is not adverse to making changes.) Which was okay with me. So far, he has planted bare root mail order material and free plants which were given to him from another forum member. The only thing in the plan that could be considered "hardscape" is the walk from the deck to the pool. Everything else is planting and mulch, existing, or "by owner." That's why your comment about the plan being "expensive" has mystified me. I can't see anything in it that is remotely out-of-the-ordinary expensive. Besides the walk to the pool, there's no call for expensive exotics plants. It's all run-of-the-mill, more or less readily available landscape plants in beds that are mulched. If you tried to answer my question in your previous post (about why you thought it was expensive), I could not decipher it. |
|
- Posted by oceandweller 8B (My Page) on Tue, Mar 5, 13 at 15:46
| Pms plan of a firepit, deck, Japanse maples, river birches, etc. x3 is an pretty expensive plan. That deck will set the OP back about 1k though etc. The design is very well thought out and you can see the legwork put into it, it gives a very nice yard, good windbreak, good winter color, and the RB will have nice texture. The landscaping while not overly expensive isn't overly budget friendly. A Deck, mad curves, ginkgo, hardscaping around a firepit, groves of trees. I just know that the homeowner is on a budget, a few select trees in the right local may do more than anything... thats all. Yall were thinking long term "PLANS" which is totally cool. Sense I have no idea of the budget I can't speculate on guess on what the OP was saying- OD |
|
| OD, the comment about the landscape being expensive threw me because there's not anything out of the ordinary for a typical suburban backyard landscape. The planting has a few more than average trees as the owner wishes to establish a woodland appearance to portions of the back yard. He plans to use small material and do it as he can so it's not a significant cost ... not anything like having it done by a professional contractor with larger plant material. The deck at the house was existing and the one by the pool is "by owner" so it's as much or little as he wishes. (It's finished now.) The hardscaping at the fire pit is aggregate if memory serves so it doesn't get any lower cost that ... other than bare dirt. Not sure what the "mad curves" you refer to are, but I can't see a great additional cost in any of the curved edges of the landscape beds as they are trench edged. I suggested a brick or paver walkway at one point, but don't know what the OP will end up really doing for that. If one does it as a DIY project, it can be quite affordable. I know in my own DIY landscape projects I can put a yard together for 1/10 the cost of a professional job. I still get a professional quality job, hardscape included. It just takes longer. Of course, that's not counting my time or labor! |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Wed, Mar 6, 13 at 14:19
| Thanks both Yardvaark and Oceandweller on the comments. We understand that our plan isn't an "overnight fix" but rather an evolving "living" plan. Last year we probably spent approximately $200 on all plants. We planted bare root river birch and redbud trees purchased from Coldstream nursery (which I highly recommend). The redbuds tripled in size and the river birches doubled. Keep in mind that we had a terribly hot and dry summer also. We did not lose one of these trees. The rest of the plants were donated or purchased from an online nursery or Menards, We want diversity in our yard and like Yaardvark previously stated, are striving for a woodsy "Northwoods" feel". The only direction we really need privacy at this point is to the north. The lots behind us have still not been developed and the neighbors to the south are older and are hardly ever outside. The river birch area will fill in fairly quickly and I plan on rebuilding the fence in the area (making it a foot talled and less space between the pickets). To be honest, I am really enjoying the process. There is a certain level of satisfaction in planting small trees/shrubs and watching them grow and mature. Maybe that's not the most functional approach but it's become a bit of a hobby too. Anyway, we are satisfied with our progress and that's what matters most. |
This post was edited by pmsmith2032 on Wed, Mar 6, 13 at 14:21
|
| Nothing to add except I love what you are doing and your attitude is the best! Enjoy. It won't be all that long before your yard is beautiful and private! Hope you keep everyone posted over the years, even lurkers like me! |
|
| pmsmith2032, I like that ... "living" plan! :-) It's good to hear your comments and especially that you are enjoying the process. That it's become "a bit of a hobby" is an early warning sign of possible, oncoming plant/yard-improvement addiction. As the yard comes together, you may conclude it's worth investing even more $ and more time in your little spot of Paradise. There is a lot of satisfaction in creating a pleasant place to be. Hope you keep enjoying it more and more! |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Thu, Mar 28, 13 at 9:37
| I just ordered and received ten small 'Skyrocket' junipers (about a foot tall). How should I layout them out when I plant them? Should I plant them in a 'L' shape along the back corner of our backyard (south east corner behind pool) to border the fence? Or should they be planted in a more varied, clump configuration? Thanks in advance! |
|
| I think a simple, architectural, straightforward L-shape--as a screening wall--@ the fence corner would be the better way to use them long term. Centers at 30" to 36" spacing & 2' away from the fence. |
|
- Posted by pmsmith2032 5b (My Page) on Fri, Mar 29, 13 at 8:28
| Thanks! Now I just need to wait until the ground thaws. |
Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum. If you are a member, please log in. If you aren't yet a member, join now!
Return to the Landscape Design Forum
Instructions
- You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
- Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
- After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
- It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
- HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
- No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
- If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
- If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.























































