|
Follow-Up Postings:
|
| Well, this being the landscape design forum, we tend to focus on the overall design and not on the specific plant selections, though some suggestions may be forthcoming. But overall, plant suggestions are best found at your local nursery, because the key issue is often what you can buy. We can suggest plants until we're blue, but if you can't get them, it was all for nought. For me, there are too many wrong plants here for me to have too many thoughts yet of what the right plants might be. The tree on the left that appears to be planted about 4 inches from the house is a real detractor from anything else that might be good about the garden. The lilacs are, as you point out, too big for their space too, to the extent that they shut in your front door. And the rugosa roses might be good for the time they're in bloom, but they are rather limited interest, shapeless blobby things to be the keystone of your house's presentation to the public. When you use deciduous plants for front yard landscaping (as opposed to for screening or whatever their other attributes are), the best ones to use are those that have some attraction other than bloom such as nice foliage shape or colour, or some specific form attribute that makes them attractive year-round. These all have undistinguished foliage and form. I don't know if the roses bloom for long enough to be worth their space. Even if they do, for my taste you don't have enough structure from evergreen forms to offset their random shape. I don't know if you've stuck with the previous owners' plantings because you like them, or if you haven't thought of making more dramatic changes, but I'd do some shovel pruning here if I were you, and look for new shrubs before I worried too much about the little flowers. The perfect jewelry won't offset an ugly, ill-fitting dress. KarinL |
|
| Got chainsaw? I'd agree removal of the tree on the left would brighten your views considerably. Beyond that, my first impression from the "entire front" pic is one of uniform leaf texture. If you could mass a few plants with, for example, very large upright leaves in a shade of purple, or arching strappy leaves in a shade of red, or very large, round leaves with a shiny surface held horizontally (I'm making these up), you would get more contrast with the existing plants. (Even your fading tulip leaves add a little contrast.) Mix it up a bit. You can get a lot of permanent color in the garden using foliage. For inspiration, look at posts on this forum by bahia. Note the variety of heights, forms, colors, and textures in his photos. |
Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum. If you are a member, please log in. If you aren't yet a member, join now!
Return to the Landscape Design Forum
Instructions
- You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
- Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
- After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
- It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
- HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
- No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
- If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
- If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.




