Return to the Fruit & Orchards Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Avocado Experiment Results

Posted by TrpnBils 6B (My Page) on
Wed, May 21, 14 at 22:16

Just realized I posted this to the wrong forum this morning.... going to try to see if I can delete it in the other one!

The experimental design class I teach is geared towards research and science-minded 11th and 12th graders and is intended to get them out of the mindset of "cookie cutter labs" and into real-world research projects. I like the idea of not knowing what will happen and doing research for the sake of knowledge rather than only for a grade (although, being a school, I had to assign a grade to things anyway).

One of the projects the students chose to work on this year was looking at the effects of increased heat and atmospheric CO2 on the growth of avocado plants. One students' dad owns a Mexican restaurant, so he gave us 120 avocado seeds (about 3 days' worth of guacamole for him) in August. Students germinated the seeds in soil rather than in water and had approximately 100 of the seeds take root and then sprout. We took the 90 healthiest looking plants and formed three groups experimental groups. In 4x2'x8" planters that they built (after presenting proposals on four different designs and then voting on one), three groups of 30 plants were transplanted in December. In January, two of the planters were given a clear, airtight lid 24" high to increase heat retention and to prevent CO2 from leaking out (each was then given six 1" slits at the top for ventilation since CO2 is heavier than air). One planter was the control, open to the greenhouse (DTH 82F, NTL 65F), one covered one was heat only (only because of the plastic lid), and one was CO2 + heat. CO2 was added continuously to the third group until early May when the experiment ended, and data on CO2 concentration, ambient humidity, and temperature were taken weekly with a digital meter.

We expected that the heat and heat+CO2 groups might grow taller, but we didn't really expect what happened, although it crossed our list of potential outcomes rather briefly. For the first few days, the CO2 levels were monitored to make sure that the system was behaving correctly and that we weren't losing an inordinate amount of the gas, and we saw what we expected during that time: The CO2 levels spiked to levels 3-4x the ambient level, held for several days, and we dropped the checks back to weekly. What surprised us was that after the first few days, the CO2 levels in that experimental group went back down to, and on sunny days, lower than ambient levels in the greenhouse.

Fast forward to May - we dismantled the canopies and took final observations including leaf node placement, median height of all plants in each planter, overall appearance, and leaf orientation.

RESULTS:

Heat Only -
Tallest median height (~25% taller than control group)
Spindly look to the plants
Leaves mostly in the top 50% of the plant stalk

CO2 + Heat -
Taller median height than control, but shorter than heat only group (~19% taller than control group)
Very full look to the plants, very healthy looking
Leaves grew over the entire length of the stem from soil to the top instead of just in the top 50% like the others
Plants had roughly DOUBLE the amount of leaves (some were HUGE!) as plants in the other two groups

So our thoughts here were that the increased CO2 spiked in the first few days until the plants could adjust and produce more leaves to compensate for (take advantage of?) the extra CO2. When they did, CO2 was metabolized at a greater amount because of more leaves, and CO2 levels dropped to ambient levels because of it. On sunny days when more photosynthesis would take place, CO2 levels dropped to lower than ambient levels because of increased leaf number.
Because of this, we don't think we hit the maximum concentration of CO2 that the plants could metabolize (some research shows that saturated CO2 environments will cause growth to be affected negatively at a certain point). We also think that the plants didn't grow as tall as the "heat" group because energy was used to grow leaves instead of just height.

It was a neat experiment to be sure, and we were able to find homes for our 90+ avocado trees after it was all over among the students and faculty of the school. Whether we're totally right in our assumptions, I don't know, but it seems logical to me and my students!

 photo P1000008_zpsf662e434.jpg

 photo P1000006_zpsa0682c0e.jpg

 photo P1000124_zpsc7501152.jpg

 photo P1000134_zpsda38e1ad.jpg

 photo P1000139_zps67c1ca6a.jpg

This post was edited by TrpnBils on Wed, May 21, 14 at 22:21


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Avocado Experiment Results

TrpnBils,

That is a great experiment! Oddly, now that cannabis is legal in Colorado, there are billboard signs all over advertising CO2 cannisters!

I have always assumed that there was unnecessary hype regarding CO2 levels, as the plants will "recycle" it. But it also shows how essential our forests are.

Thanks for sharing!


 o
RE: Avocado Experiment Results

  • Posted by gnappi 10 Coral Springs Fl. (My Page) on
    Sat, May 31, 14 at 15:09

Even sci-fi writers know that the Earth adapts and repairs given time, your experiments are a cool indicator of how on track this thinking is.

I read recently that for a human to be "carbon neutral" it takes from 2-10 (size not completely specified) trees (scientists always disagree) to make enough oxygen for one person.

All this Co2 "hype" makes me wonder why nobody is calling for more tree planting. :-)


 o
RE: Avocado Experiment Results

What a great teacher you are! And what great germination rates your student's produced.

Of course more CO2 is good for plants. It is why the equator is producing more foliage than ever via satellite tracking since the 50's. Increasing CO2 levels is good for the trees. It allows them to create sugars from CO2 (with light) to fuel plant growth [yield]. The amount of CO2 as a percentage that would hurt plants would hurt us first. And all that increased photosynthesis produces all of that toxic waste gas that corrodes everything: oxygen.

Keep in mind something else, CO2 is taken up but the plant (I think limited to the daytime) through stomata. Its conversion into sugars and then into starches is a series of chemical reactions in the chloroplasts. Once the system is saturated (if) or shuts down at night the CO2 remaining does no harm. The more chloroplasts the more CO2 that can be processed. The more sugars the more energy available to produce more chloroplasts (protein and lipids (oils) must also be produced).

All that warming just equals more areas for increased plant growth. More plant growth equals more cooling. More water usage as well but also more water soil retention and erosion control and increased local rains.

As I recall, 2mil plastic is fairly permeable to CO2 and 4mil fairly impermeable.

I trust those new homes will all be containers because most avocados won't survive the first frost and the cold hardy are hardy only down to about 26F at most.

This post was edited by Fascist_Nation on Sat, May 31, 14 at 18:24


 o
RE: Avocado Experiment Results

Thanks for the replies - we definitely had a good time with this experiment. I had one of my students comment yesterday when he was working on his final research paper for this that "he just realized that he dedicated an entire year to avocados without question." It wasn't quite that bad because we were working on multiple projects at the same time (this one involved long periods of inactivity punctuated by very short periods of actually working on the project once the initial setup was completed).

Regardless, our move next year will be to work on how to utilize the greenhouse for growing during the winter months without propane heat because our grant was used up on that this year!


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Fruit & Orchards Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Please review our Rules of Play before posting.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.


Learn more about in-text links on this page here