You have shown that some doctors do some dishonest things, not all doctors, not most doctors, not a significant portion of doctors. It seems to me that your conclusion from this piece of news is conveniently close to what you have been saying since the start, which leads me to believe that the way you presented this news is dishonest.

Can we get back to herbalism now?

The police caught a meth dealer the other day. We need to get rid of the police and switch to a psychic police force so that we can avoid having anyone deal meth, because if they aren't caught that means they aren't dealing right?

As long as you're going on in this vein (sorry), if the police failed to catch the dealer, it obviously would mean we need to stop having police and use all-natural self-policing instead.

Isn't it wonderful when no matter what the evidence points straight to your conclusion, its a whole lot easier to be right if reality bends to your whims rather than the other way around.

Disclaimer: lest this too be quoted out of context I am being facetious not serious, I do not expect reality to conform to my point of view, thats why my point of view changes with reality.