Return to the Perennials Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
compare magic ftns and fantasia delphs

Posted by deanna_in_nh 5a/4b (My Page) on
Sat, May 28, 11 at 22:18

Does anybody know the difference between the magic fountain series of delphiniums and the fantasia series? I've got sprouts of both, but I haven't been able to figure out their differences so I can plan where to put them.

Thank you!


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: compare magic ftns and fantasia delphs

just googling:

Magic Fountains

Favorites for cutting (FYI: that's catalog code for "they'll fall over or flop if you don't cut them or stake/support them somehow"), they are classic Delphiniums; elegant and dramatic with easy to work with heights of 2 1/2 - 3 1/2 Ft. or so.

Delphinium, Fantasia Mixed Colors
Fantastic, upright delphinium that needs no staking. Semi-dwarf plants produce 15" main spikes with many smaller 10" side branches. Colorful flower spikes of white, lavender and blue shades, all accented with white bees, cover the flower stems. Over-all plant height 27".


 o
RE: compare magic ftns and fantasia delphs

I know that's what they say, but I had a magic fountain that I wouldn't say was classic. I thought the classic delph was the big huge tall Pacifica (is that right?) kind. Mine was more of a smaller delph and the blooms had a slight droop to them. Also, mine never got anywhere near 3.5 feet! The two varieties just seemed to be so similar.

I guess one thing for me to figure out is what a "classic" delphinium is!


 o
RE: compare magic ftns and fantasia delphs

Magic Fountains are not floppy in my experience. They are a little shorter than the original Pacific Hybrids.

I'm not familiar with the Fantasia strain, but the Pacifics have been replaced by the New Millennium or New Zealand hybrids. These are "classic" Delphiniums!


 o
RE: compare magic ftns and fantasia delphs

Are the leaves different? I don't know the particular hybrids you mentioned, but it has been my experience over the years that delphs with big, fat, velvety hand-sized leaves are much less likely to droop, and are usually taller than the ones with skinny finger-type leaves. I also found the big-leaf ones much more likely to be perennial, in OH (5b.) Haven't tried any where I live now. If somebody would like to add the correct technical leaf terms for these shapes, that's cool, I don't know them.


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Perennials Forum

Instructions

  • You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
  • HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
  • No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.



 
Click here to learn more about in-text links on this page.