Return to the Perennials Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Posted by echinaceamaniac 7 (My Page) on
Thu, Jun 5, 08 at 14:20

I have grown coneflowers forever. I even use them in my user name; however, the Big Sky series is so pitiful that I couldn't go any longer without commenting on it.

Twilight (Red): I bought 3 plants last year. Not one of them survived the summer. They were weak plants even when I purchased a gallon container plant. The plant did bloom before croaking, but the blooms fade to pink after only a few days. They hardly ever looked like the pictures used to con me into purchasing them. These plants would just turn black. I have never grown such sickly coneflowers before.

Sunrise (Pale Yellow): Distorted blooms, not healthy. Blooms fade to a pale yellow that looks dirty white. The blooms are only pretty for a day or two and then they look like a pastel sucky version of themselves. They did return from last year, but are now so small and not blooming. I pulled one out yesterday. I'm waiting on the other one, but so far these are weak.

Harvest Moon (Dark Yellow): I loved the bloom color at first, but they fade within a day or two and become this ugly pastel color. This year 2 plants returned out of 2 at least, but one has distorted blooms like the discontinued Sunset plants which had problems in tissue culture.

Sundown (Orange): Last year I bought several of these plants. They couldn't take the summer heat in Tennessee. Heck, our state is perfect for growing coneflowers. We even have one named after the state. I watered them and kept a few alive through the summer. The only problem is this year the blooms are not so orange anymore. They are a pinker color. They suck anyway because the orange color didn't last but a day or two and then it faded to an ugly pastel version of the original color.

After Midnight (Dark Purple): These were so finicky. It could rain and they would die. Seriously. I've never seen such week plants. I replaced 3 of them and only 1 is still alive this year. I bought 5 plants in all and only 1 returned. I like the blooms and stem color on these, but they do fade fast just like the other Big Sky series plants.

Summer Sky (The First bi-colored Coneflower): The color was disappointing. I agree it does appear to be two-toned, but not enough to justify a new plant variety. My Pallida plants have two-toned blooms and they are grown from seed. They are also better plants and don't fade as bad. They also return every year! This plant is the worst of all! I bought 3 and only one survived the summer and came back this year. It only has 3 stalks! LOL. This thing is pitiful. If it rains for a few days it starts dying. Seriously!

Summary: Big Sky Coneflowers are sucky, diseased plants that aren't even comparable to the wild species plants. Sure they have color for a day or two, but what good is it when they keep fading and getting diseases. All of my other coneflowers look great. My Razmatazz, Double Delight, Coconut Lime, and all wild varieties look healthier than ever. All of those returned and look beautiful. Were these things rushed to the market without any testing? I went to a greenhouse and was told they no longer carry these plants because people complained about them so much.

Advice: If you want an Orange coneflower, get Tiki Torch. I bought 4 of those this year and they are beautiful and don't fade. They are also healthier than the Big Sky series. As far as yellow goes, the only one I'd get is Paradoxa. It is tougher than Sunrise and Harvest Moon. I am so disappointed in these plants after spending so much money. They are a disaster.


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Echinaceamaniac, I am glad you started this thread. I would love to hear other people's opinions. I planted 4 of Big Sky plants last fall. 2 survived (Sundown and Sunset). I replaced After Midnight. So far so good: it grows and has buds. Will see...
I also added Double Delight and 'Tiki Torch' this spring.
Do you grow 'Sunset' and 'Fatal Attraction'?


 o
RE: Fatal Attraction/Sunset

Alina, I grow Fatal Attraction. It returned this year, but doesn't look as good as the original, plain varieties.

Of the newer varieties, I only recommend the following:

Tiki Torch (Best color EVER!)I won't say for sure this one is perfect until next Spring if my 4 plants return...but so far this one is the biggest surprise of all. This has the prettiest orange blooms of any plant I've grown. They don't fade like the others. They get a darker, deeper color and then gradually fade to a lighter orange. Overall though they are the prettiest and healthiest of all the orange coneflowers.

Coconut Lime (Bought one small plant and it returned healthy) Some people don't like the blooms, but I think they are very unique and highly recommend them.

Double Delight (Best double pink. Healthy. Perfect) I bought one small plant through mail order. It performed better than the Big Sky Series plants that I bought in several local nurseries. That tells you how bad the Big Sky series is. Mail Order plants out perform plants that weren't shipped!

Razmatazz (Pink, Taller than double delight, but it's great too) Both of my plants returned. I made 3 new ones last week from basal cuttings. All 3 rooted. The blooms remind me of zinnias. The good thing is they return every year perfectly.

Harvest Moon seems to be the healthiest of the Big Sky Series. It seems to have problems with quilled petals like Sunset from time to time. I highly recommend that you don't grow Sunset. I think it was recalled. It sucks.

From my observations if you can get After Midnight to ever stop dying, it will become a pretty plant. I have one that survived and it looks ok for now, but I won't get my hopes up for this sucker. They dropped like flies last year.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Sunset, Summer Sky, Twilight and After Midnight all returned for me this year.

Harvest Moon & Sundown plus Fragrant Angel(not a Big Sky but...) all died over the winter.

I chose to replace Harvest Moon. I loved the color and it held for me. I was dissatisfied with the color of Sunrise.

The ones that did not survive were also all from the same vendor. Out of 7 plants total bought from this vendor, only 3 survived.
Also, one of you sent an email and somehow it was delivered to me. Don't know why or how?????
I tried to purchase Tiki Torch but there was a crop failure, so it was not available. I would love to have one though!


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

OK, at least some of them are doing OK for you. Our climate is similar to yours, so your experience is useful for me. I forgot to say that 'Harvest Moon' also survived the winter.
Is the color of 'Tiki Torch' close to pictures? Never seen it in person. Pictures look terrific, but I suspect they are doctored... Mine has one bud, cannot wait to see it blooming!


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Alina,

I think the Tiki Torch looks close to the pictures on Terra Nova's site. It might actually be a prettier color. I can't imagine next year if they return and the blooms look even better. This has to be the best new plant of the year in my opinion. It's funny because while the buds are opening they look brownish, but the next day you will walk by and they will stand out this bright orange color unlike anything you've ever seen. I was amazed by them. I'm going to do some cuttings from them when they get larger. Note: The blooms will fade after a week or two, but it is more like the original coneflowers fade and not the quick ugly fade of the Big Sky Series.


 o
Tiki Torch blooms

Here's an untouched photo of Tiki Torch in my garden. These blooms are so colorful that they can't be captured with a camera, but this is as close as I could get to them. Keep in mind they look better in person!


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Wow, great! If it will be a reliable perennial in my zone, I will be completely happy with it!
Thanks for posting the picture. So far, I've seen only promotional pictures of it.
Do you propagate Echinaceas by cutting? Is it a succefull method for you?


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Alina,

Here's how I do it. Plant one in a sunny spot. When they start putting up the little plantlets around the crown, water them good and wait a few weeks. You might have to wait until next year for a young plant. Wiggle they plantlets back and forth and they will gently break from the mother plant. These will usually have one little root or two. I dip the bottoms in Clonex gel. I then take them and place them in Jiffy seed starting mix in 3 inch peat pots and place them in a clear plastic tote from Wal-mart with a fluorescent light over it. I leave them there for about 2 weeks if they have a root on them when started. It may take longer if there are no roots (up to 4 weeks.) I leave the light on 24/7. You can tell when they've rooted because the plants won't easily pull out of the mix. The humidity in the tote keeps them from wilting. Don't water them unless the top of the mix looks almost dry. Overwatering is usually the culprit if they don't root.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

My report (planted all in late spring 2007 and we had the worst drought ever in North Carolina):

Harvest Moon -- planted a flat. ONE plant survived.
Sundown/Sunset -- got those mixed up, but I think I've only lost 1-2 plants out of 2 flats. The colors aren't as orange as I had hoped. They turned pink after the orange last year. The plants are just starting to bloom right now. Here's a photo from yesterday...can you tell me which one it is (Sundown or Sunset)? I think it is Sunset due to the pale color.

I think Tiki Torch will be my replacement...I'm using Tithonia in the butterfly garden this year to get that orange that I need.

I love echinacea rubinstern 'Ruby Star'. It's my favorite in places where I use this color scheme.


If we want to talk about disappointing plants...don't get me started on coreopsis! Terrible results from last year with Heaven's Gate, Sweet Dreams, Limerock Ruby and Creme Brulee. I lost only 1/3 of the CBs...lost all of the others.

Cameron

Here is a link that might be useful: my gardening blog


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Wonbyherwits, your garden is beautiful! Thanks for posting the link to your blog. I am going to get some ideas there for sure.


 o
RE: Sundown or Sunset

Wonbyherwits, The coneflower with distorted petals in your garden is Sunset. The orange one that looks normal is Sundown. Sunset has been discontinued because of the deformed petals. Notice how the petals aren't all flat and normal. This is one of the many problems with the Big Sky Series. I have a Harvest Moon with petals just like it on some stems. They are mutants!


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

thanks! I answered your email.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

That was a remarkably thorough rant! It was observant, informative and interesting. A good rant


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

I agree none of mine made it through the winter. I also had touble with deer nibbling on them.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Add me to the list of those unhappy with the new echinaceas. I only tried a couple and waited for them to be on sale and they were still more expensive than I usually spend. Harvest Moon never returned for me and it was shorter than I wanted and not vigorous at all the one season I had it. I think I had another one, but I forget which one. I don't have that anymore either.

I went back to purchasing Primadona Rose this year.

pm2


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

I agree - they SUCK big time!! Bought Sunrise and Sundown last year and they are both struggling to come back. I just might put them out of their misery.

Thought I was the only one having problems with them. Glad you posted. Other Echinaceas are just busting through and heading for glory!


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Well, the Big Sky Echinacea is doing okay in my garden, but I only have 2 hybrids. While reading through some of the other loooooong threads posted to this forum about the new Echinacea, it does seem like there is a high loss rate with these plants. Unacceptable considering what they cost.

Bought 2 Sunrise in Spring '06 and those are doing very well. In fact, I would describe them as extremely vigorous. I divided and moved one this Spring, and I think I've got some Sunrise seedlings out there too, but it's hard to tell because they are mixed with Echinacea purpurea. I like the color of Sunrise, and don't mind them fading a bit.

Then I bought 3 Summer Sky last summer - late, after they had bloomed and they were 1/2 off. I was worried they may not have had enough time to get established. But they are up and growing very well this Spring. And there are lots of little seedlings under these plants. Can't wait to see these bloom and wonder if they will fade or be mutant-like.

That's it though - I didn't go crazy on these hybrids. I like plain old Echinacea purpurea, and also have 'White Swan'.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

I just planted Big Sky "Twilight" a couple weeks ago. Seems to be growing well. Will see what happens when bloom time comes around and then next spring.

Also planted "Frangrant Angel" and hope that is hardier than others experience with Big Sky series.

Will see how they do this year and check in spring so I'll have time to get one of older Echinaceas if they don't work out in Butterfly Garden.

One of the advantages of Big Sky series is smaller size for limited spaces and lack of full sun sites in which to locate older varieties. I've read some comments that Echinacea will "grow almost anywhere" but wary of putting them in less than 6 hours of good sunlight.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Echinaceamaniac, thanks for the detailed description of the division process! I hope I will be able to get some offsets of my 'Tiki Torch' - this baby is expensive...


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Before I read this thread I planted three After Midnight.

Then last week I was talking to a co worker and she planted 4 last year and only 2 came back.

Guess I'm holding my breath and planning for a hole next year LOL


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

The Sundown echinaceas were starting to look better this morning. The small coneheads are growing the regular size petals with droop...just have to wait a day or two for the formation of the full bloom:

Here is a link that might be useful: gardening blog


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

wonbyherwits,

That's the best looking Sundown I've seen. Mine look pitiful by comparison. I think they are very finicky about the weather. We had a lot of rain this spring and the Big Sky Series couldn't take it, but the old-fashioned varieties could.

Some company should trial these plants in gardens. I would like to hear what experts have to say. There is something about them that is weaker. They are a cross with Paradoxa, but even it is growing good in my garden. Could something be wrong with the tissue culture of these plants? I know Razmatazz is tissue cultured, but it's very healthy. Too many people have had trouble with these plants for me to believe it's not the plants. I have one After Midnight that came back this year. It looks healthy like your Sundown. One Harvest Moon looks healthy too, but the other one is deformed. I planted these in the ideal location too. I've had nothing but good luck with all the other varieties.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

My best performing coneflowers are older: Magnus, White Swan and Kim's Knee High. Of the newer coneflowers, Sunrise has done the best - it's two years old now and is a big bushy clump. I also planted Hope and Fragrant Angel in the spring of 2006 and they were puny last year, but this year Hope looks much better. Fragrant Angel is still pretty small, but also looks better than last year. Little Giant and Kim's Mophead died over the winter a couple years ago.

Juliet


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

How do and how fast do any of these spread for you? I just bought 3 of the double decker from bluestones sale.

Thanks
Karyn


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

I've posted about these before. I feel lucky after reading all these posts. I bought 4 on ebay last spring - Sunrise, Sunset, Harvest Moon, and Summer Sky. They were plugs that were repotted into the next size up pot right before I bought them. I could tell that by how the root systems were are in the center of the pot.

They seemed slow to settle in, but did eventually. All bloomed and I was satisfied with what I saw. I held my breath all winter, wondering if they were going to come back. All did and each has already set buds, soon to bloom. I couldn't be more pleased with them, but I know I will worry every winter that may not be there the next spring. The older, pink ones such as Magness, or Bright Star were ones you could always count on.

Linda


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

It's strange how these things are so unpredictable. One of my After Midnight plants is blooming now and looks so much more colorful than last year. I was able to get 2 basal cuttings off of it yesterday. They both had roots already! The other 4 After Midnight plants are in plant heaven! They all received the same water, etc. in the same flower bed. They all were purchased at the same place. I'm going to experiment with different lighting and locations with these plants and see if I can come up with some advice for others about what works with them.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Linlily, I am curious how you were able to purchase these plants on eBay. The Big Sky Echinacea are all patented plants and unlicensed propogation is prohibited. Do they have licensed distributors on eBay or are they selling them illegally?

I remember reading about people selling a supposedly blue peony called "Blue Lagoon" on Ebay. Auctions were bid up to ridiculous prices. Well, there is no such cultivar and there is no blue peony, and the poor suckers discovered after a year or 2 that the peonies were pink when they bloomed.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Terrene, one of the Ebay sellers (Perfect Plants) is actually Park's/Wayside. They do have a license. There are some licensed nurseries on Ebay as well.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers *DO NOT* suck!

  • Posted by mayalena 6 - MetroWest Boston (My Page) on
    Tue, Jun 10, 08 at 13:26

Well -- I have to say that I am very happy so far with my Sundown echinacea. 3 have come back reliably after 2 winters now, and I've just added 2 more. I've got Sunrise going in another spot, and they look really healthy too.
I also have 1 or 2 Twilights -- they are shorter, and I am having a hard time seeing them among the Sundowns, but I am pretty sure they are there.

I think we hear dissatisfied voices more often than satisfied ones, so perhaps that's why it seems that "Too many people have had trouble with these plants." I am pretty certain that Saul Nursery tested them before launch.

ML


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

My take is that so many perennials are 100% perfect that when one has a little problem it is heard about very loudly.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

These plants don't have a "little problem." There are places which no longer sell them because they don't over-winter well. Echinacea plants are usually very reliable perennials. These aren't. I would say that a perennial that isn't reliably perennial is a big problem.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

I have to agree with echinaceamaniac. I do not expect any perennial to be 100% perfect. I have lost my share of many plants. However, for the price of these plants, the problems are overwhelming.

Over the past three years, I have lost 4 of 4 Sunrise, 4 of 4 Sunset, 2 of 2 Twilight, 2 of 2 Sundown, 3 of 3 Orange Meadowbrite, 1 of 2 Mango Meadowbright, 2 of 2 After Midnight, 2 of 2 Fatal Attraction. Both my Harvest Moon reappeared this year. However, one is a foot tall, and the other is 2" tall, and they are right next to each other! I also had Razzmatazz for two years, but it never did sprout its 'top hats' and eventually died. My only reliable bloomer is Fragrant Angel. It is now 5 years old and still going strong. And of course the old standby Ruby Star and White Swan.

This year, I got Tiki Torch, which is gorgeous, Raspberry Tart, Coconut Lime and Virgin. I am hoping that at least one of these plants lives to next year.

I do not mind spending a bit more for an unusual or new variety, but I expect that plant to at least live, even if its blooms are not what I expected. I have bought dozens of new varieties of heucheras over the last few years and only lost one. But as for the new echinaceas, maybe they need to start selling them as annuals.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

O.K., now I'm nervous about the "Twilight" I just bought. Do any of you think extra mulch over the winter might help it survive? I also bought "Ruby Star" and "White Swan", so It's good to know those two are reliable. I couldn't find "Tiki Torch" locally, so I'll probably order that from an online source. Any recommendations? Kathy


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Sorry to hear about your Razmatazz kowalleka. They are actually one of the most reliable plants for me. Both of mine came back this year. Coconut Lime is reliable too. I planted mine late in the fall and it still came back strong and larger than last year. I was able to divide a baby plant from it this afternoon. Now I have 2 of them!


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

I'm hearing terrible things about the new echinaceas locally, too, though personally I'm not having problems -- yet. I planted three Twilight and three Fatal Attraction last year. They all came through the winter and now are budding normally. They bloomed for a long time last summer; I'll have to see how they look and how long they bloom this year. This spring I added three Merlot. I compost with mushroom manure after the first hard frost, but that's really all they got. I'm sure it's luck, and, of course, they could all disappear in a really tough winter.

But you don't want to get me started on coreopsis either. . . .


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

My Sunset looked wonderful last summer - I loved it. It started out robustly this year, but in the last 10 days we've had over 5 inches of rain (unusual for us), and it's on its way out. I'm disappointed! I plan to get another one and plant it in a spot that not only doesn't stay as wet, but I'll make a little hill for it.

Deanna


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

I had problems my first year with Magnus! I lost 1 out of 3 White Swan last year, and one of the 2 survivors was very small, and is just now pushing new growth (but, to be fair, I did move it). So it isn't all about the Big Sky series. I think the problem is the aster yellows, which is caused by leafhoppers, and is not easily contolled.

Here is a link that might be useful: Aster Yellows


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

I'll be interested in following this thread long-term.

As for me, I only have 1 of the Big Sky series of Echinacea. I think I bought Sunset? It's the bi-colored one that starts orange but sort of becomes more purplish. In any case, I thought for sure it was dead this spring and almost pulled it out. Fortunately, I'm a procrastinator because all of the sudden, it leafed out and it looks beautiful now. It's thick and healthy and has a number of buds on it. It's smaller than a seed-variety coneflower but that's not necessarily bad.

I wonder if my arid climate is more hospitable to coneflowers? Perhaps they don't appreciate humidity?

I have some Tiki Torch, Coconut Lime and most of the other Terra Nova plants on my back patio right now. I'm joined a plant coop so they are plug sized but it has been a great way to get the new stuff at a reasonable price. I also ordered a few more of the Big Sky Series so I guess I'll find out first hand if there's a significant difference in my climate with these.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Strange. The only ones I have had trouble with is Sunset, with distorted petals and finally lost both. Even the ones that I planted during the drought last summer and I thought had died, have returned. I love the colors. This is just the third year for some and the second for others so I am hoping they get bigger with more blooms. The one that blooms the most is Fragrant Angel. Love it. But I want more Sundown blooms. Love the blooms and perfume of Sunrise. Unfortunately a woodchuck just discovered my garden and this is his favorite plant. He pruned the tops off all my echinacea and barely touched anything else. I just got some Shake-Away and spread it around the bed and each echinacea. I hope it does the job so that they can bloom this year.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

The Sundown keep looking better. That's a miscanthus 'Cosmopolitan' providing a backdrop of white/green variegated leaves. This is a slope, so my coneflowers are downhill mid-way between a vitex and the miscanthus. East side of house.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Oh Cameron! I love that combination! Beautiful, just beautiful. What is the little yellow bloom next to the coneflower?


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

That is a hypericum. Mounded shape, loaded with blooms when it gets going. It's a nice St. Johns Wort that behaves itself (unlike some more invasive types). It is deciduous, but it blooms and blooms. The bumble bees go crazy on it, then they just hang out on the blooms in exhaustion! They love it. Mellow yellow for bumbles.

There are 3 Homestead Purple verbena surrounding the hypericum that have been blooming continuously...I need to deadhead now.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

I will have to say I agree with you echinaceamaniac my big sky series sucks !The only one I seem to have had any success with is harvest moon!The rest are all deformed looking and I have many of them all!


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

This is my first season for bright orange 'Big Sky Sundown'. I paired it with daylily 'Hot Toddy'. Even though 'Hot Toddy' is labeled as azalea pink petals w/bright pink ribs & amber throats, it was orange. I was delighted with the beautiful combination until Sundown faded to a washed out pink. However, I will give Sundown another year.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

This string makes me sad. I really love Summer Sky and was going to plant some this fall, but now!!! My one White Swan didn't make it through last winter. It was rotted when everything else was waking up. Ohh if they were not so pretty I would give up on coneflowers. My Magnus, species and random babies do fine. What to do? What white conflowers have you found hardy? Are there any other coneflowers with that peach-pink color of a fresh Summer Sky flower?


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

A couple of messages here talk about 'cuttings', or 'basal cuttings', but the descriptions sound as if all you are doing is removing small side shoots??

Am I missing something? Are you really taking cuttings, or just waiting until the plant makes babies?


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

madtripper,

The easiest way is to remove the side shoots, but you can root cuttings if you try hard enough. I'm experimenting with this chemical called Configure. It forces coneflowers to put up many side shoots. Let's just say after 5 days, I'm very impressed!


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

I, too, have had bad luck and won't invest any more money in the trendy new colored cone flowers. I'll stick with the tried and true. I had an orange-y one (called Meadowbrite, I think?) It struggled mightly last year and put off a couple flowers this summer, then died while all the Magnus around it thrived and expanded.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Wow. I'm glad I read this thread as I was about to buy a few Big Skys. Any opinions on Merlot, Tomato Soup, Doppelganger?


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

I have another post above on this thread. My 4 different Big Sky Echinacea are up and growing well. They are doing great here in zone 5/6 and I feel that I can recommend them. This is the beginning of their 3rd full year here. Visitors to my yard always comment on them when they are in bloom.

Linda


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

I wasn't happy with any of my Big Skys either. I hope that I change my mind this year.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

I planted Sunrise, Sunset last year. Only Sunrise survived the winter. Sunset is RIP. I'll never buy another Big Sky series coneflower again.
Also, this is my SECOND try at growing Tiki Torch. I planted it last autumn, and it didn't make it through winter at all. So, this spring I planted another one to see if the long summer would help. We'll see, but I'm not impressed so far. I had high hopes for this one. :(


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

My Big Sky Sunset has disappointed. Planted in the spring, looked promising for awhile, then the blooms faded quickly, looked sickly and then the foliage developed this bronze cast to it and looks sick. Not sure if now it may have a disease.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Well I can Ditto the subject of this posting. I purchased
After Midnight, and Summer Sunset year before last, and they both died, I got two Kim's Knee High at the the same time, and this is thier second yeart doing marvelous. I found a really healthy nice looking After Midnight today for 6.00. I am going to try it one more time, in a spot which gets a bit more Sun. I really love the color, and hope it survives.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

I couldn't agree more. I've spent hundreds of dollars on the Big Sky series and your descriptions are exact to the flower.

On another note, I had some beautiful Tennessee coneflowers for two years. They all died rather suddenly. Any ideas / experience on why or how to avoid this again would be greatly appreciated. THey are one of my favorite coneflowers.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

My Aftermidnight is doing great! Also, I'm happy to say my Tiki Torch is doing wonderful finally! Maybe some just need time, and need to survive the winter! lol

Here's some pics:

Tiki Torch

Photobucket

After Midnight

Photobucket


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Summer Sky and Sunrise are the most vigorous of the bunch and other than the fact the Sunrise you buy are almost all now infected with aster yellows (and many other coneflowers, but it seems this series is the worst), they've both been great performers over the years. After Midnight is the worst of the bunch, and considering that Merlot, Vintage Wine, and Fatal Attraction are all darker and more vigorous, it isn't worth the time, effort, and $. (having said that, mine is downright gorgeous this year) NONE of the new hybrids are as vigorous as straight purpurea, and none should be treated as such. When grown properly, all can be successfully grown into z4, maybe even z3 for some of them. I've had success with all of the Big Sky series (there are 2 new ones for 2011) and all of the Terra Nova varieties from 2009 and earlier. I expect that the new varieties for this year and early releases for 2011 that I have will perform as admirably.

The Plant Geek
www.confessionsofaplantgeek.blogspot.com

Here is a link that might be useful: part 3 of my coneflowers blog posts- hybrid echinacea


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

You know I am glad I found this thread. I have 5 echinaceas and while I am happy with some I am unhappy with my Summer sky and Tomato soup. I don't know the names to 3 of them-two look like black eyed susan and the third has creamy off white petals, I love these cone flowers. That is why I got the others. This year is the first year for both summer sky and tomato soup to bloom but I am disappointed in color and size. Summer sky seems really washed out and tomato soup is TINY. I was also expecting more of a deep red from tomato soup and what I got is a reddish orange color. Should I give them another year or just get rid of them now? I was really expecting bold colors and nice sized flowers like that of my "black eyed susan" look-a-likes(size wise).
I do have to speak of their vigor though they over wintered in pots in zone 4 and they are doing pretty well on the growing front. They have been in pots all summer with this strange heatwave with no extra water lately, very forgiving and hardy. You know maybe on second thought I will keep them just because of that......hmmmmmmmmmmm................


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Dud's for me too,
I'm in zone 6, i see that in zones 7 they are surviving
tried the sunset series a few years back the first year out, lost a whole bed 189.00, I just picked up a sundown at a local shop (clearance) and had the discussion about this plant he said they are going to have to market it as an annual in the north, plants start out as perennial and when they don't make the winters they re-market them as annuals, this ones color looks awfully faded. it sure isn't the prettiest one


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Well, 3 years after this thread started, my Sunrise and Summer Sky are still alive. But the flowers on the Sunrise are almost always deformed, and I don't like the color on the Summer Sky - too orange for my taste, which then fades out to anemic pink. The other annoying thing about these hybrids is that they cross-pollinate with the E. purpurea and I get a hodge podge of mostly ugly seedlings that are tall and rangey with washed out pink blooms. They got shovel pruned this year.

I am sticking to the straight species E. purpurea, and its cultivars. I love White Swan, am starting others from seed - Pow wow wild berry, Primadonna White, etc., and bought some 'Prairie Splendor' from Bluestone this year.

Also I have one small bloom on the E. paradoxa this year, started from seed (your seeds E-maniac).


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Awesome! I like paradoxa. I've been experimenting with it this year. I have some that I planted close to a rose bush. The blooms looked nice peaking out from them!


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

I posted here in May of '09. I have to disagree. So far, all my Big Sky Echinaceas are still going strong. And they've given me a few interesting seedlings. This year is the first year I've ones that are pink. Most have looked like the the parent, excetp for Sunrise, which has never gave me any volunteers.

I posted this on a previous thread a couple of weeks ago:
FFO Sundown Seedling

This is a volunteer from Sundown. The only other Echincea anywhere near it on this side of the house is Paradoxa. I suspect that it is a cross between Paradoxa and Sundown. The color has held well in these last couple of weeks, and there are tons of flowers that have opened on this 43 inch tall plant. The cone smells like paradoxa and has the same hard feel.

So, I have to disagree - I love the Big Sky Series Echies.

Linda


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

My Big Sky sundown was fantastic for 3 years then didn't come back this year. After Midnight, a dud. Summer Sky is doing wonderfully, as is the morning one. Pow Wow Berry, bought this year, is thriving. No luck on Green Envy. Irresistable, bought this year, is weird but doing okay. So many of those that you all mention are ones I've never ever seen in any of my travels in search of new plants.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

capecodder, you just reminded me...I lost a Pow Wow Wild Berry that was given to me last fall by a gardening friend. It was put in the same time as four others - Bright Star, Ruby Star, Milk Shake, and another one that I need to check the tag on. PWWB was the only one that did not come back. And all of these were planted in the same general area, with the same soil.

As to ones that you never see at local garden centers, box stores, etc, there are new varieties of Echinacea coming out every year now, and I've gotten to the point that I can no longer keep up with them and keep them all straight as to which is which color. Maybe old age....

I still would like to find E. Pink Poodle, but I've read so many posts about it sometimes not looking at all like the picture. Still, I'd love to give it a try!

Linda


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Linlily, that pic is very pretty, if my seedlings looked like that they sure wouldn't have gotten shovel pruned! Perhaps you get more interesting plants when crossing the Big Sky plants with E. paradoxa than with E. purpurea.

I did actually get one seedling I liked, it looked as though Sunrise had crossed with the Echinacea Rocky Tops, which I believe is Tennessee Coneflower? It had the same flower shape as E. tennesseensis but was much taller. Flowers were great for cutting! Unfortunately the rampaging voles ate that one this past winter. :(


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

In the same bed, terrene, are two regular looking pink ones. They are nice and tall but look like the regular E. purpurea. I'm going to ask neighbors if they would like to have them. They are growing right up next to my Sundown and I need to move them.

I think you might be right about crossing the Big Sky plants with E. Paradoxa. You might get something really special and different. I have a friend who has offered to grow out some of the seeds from my tangerine orange seedling just to see what we get. I'm definitely taking her up on it. Since Paradoxa has been blooming about the same time as this seedling, maybe more crossing has taken place by the bees. You just never know.

It's really awful that the voles ate your tall cross. It sounds like a really nice plant and I love the idea of the tall flowers.

Linda


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

fully agree - rubbish, all of them. Several nurseries and our university botanics no longer bother with these (expensive) primadonnas


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

I don't understand, campanula. If they are rubbish, why do some of us have so much success growing them? I've had other perennials, such as numerous delphiniums, through the years, that have lasted 2 or three years and disappeared? My Big Sky Echies are now 5 years old and look as good now as they did in year 2. And mine where purchased on-line as replanted plugs in 3 inch pots. I just don't think you can make a generalization like that and it be a valid point.

Linda


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

I wish I'd found this forum before I invested in several Summer Sky plants. I posted over on the Far North forum originally but didn't get a lot of feedback. I have to agree with the first poster: these plants suck. All of the foliage except for one leaf died back after planting and that one surviving leaf is now also dead. Over the years, I've been growing species and its cultivars with no problem. The 'Milkshake' and 'White Swan' are doing great, all planted at the same time with the same care as the Big Sky. An expensive experiment and a lesson well-learned.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

I'm from Denmark , theoretically zone 6-7. Not only Big Sky Series, but nearly all the other fancy ones were a total failure here. The plants die just because you look at them. Sometimes they survive the winter just to shrink to nothing during the spring. If they survive their flowers are distorted. The list of total rubbish include: The whole Big Sky series, Tiki Torch, Fragrant Angel, Art's pride. Meringue is a very weak grower here, as well as Double Pink Delight and Fatal Attraction. Of the newer ones, only one returned bigger than last year: Hot Summer.

Plants that thrive: Razzamatazz, Coconut Lime, Champagne Bubbles, Hope, Avalanche, White Swan. Hot Papaya looks to be vigorous.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

Well what was left of the 1 Sunrise has been eaten by voles. 2 of the 3 original Summer Sky are hanging on, but I am again dismayed at how quickly they fade out.

It is true Linlily, that these plants have done okay for a few people, and that there is a long list of other species' fancy cultivars that have failed for me too. IMO, the rate of failure of the new Echinaceas is too high to justify the expense. I don't plan on buying any more of them until (maybe) they have proven their staying power.

In the meantime, my seedlings of Echinacea Pow Wow Wild Berry, Primadonna White, and Bravado are overall doing very well. We'll see how they do - it's kind of an experiment, but a lot less expensive one than buying plants.


 o
RE: Big Sky Coneflowers SUCK!

What I really hate about this flower is the razor sharp needle-like seeds! Now THAT SUCKS! Add to that I was spreading this demon seed while my hands were very sensitive. Not Fun.


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Perennials Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.


Learn more about in-text links on this page here