|
| I would greatly appreciate some advice and opinions on whether to build a pondless water feature or a pond. I'm hiring a contractor to finalize a 2.5 year project in my back yard. I will have a small waterfall feeding a 30' stream either terminating into a 11' x 16" pond or just using the pondless approach. I'm leaning towards the pond but want some advise from folks who my have a experince with either of the two. I like the idea of a pond and the associated plant and animal live (I would have fish), but don't think I really appreciate the amount of maintenance required on a daily, weekly, monthly and yearly basis. I'd love what you guys think. I've read a bunch of info on both, but most of the info is presented in the form of articles that have a tendency to be a bit vanilla. In the end, I know it's a personal preference ... that's the problem.... I don't have a preference yet. I just don't want to make a mistake of having this pond built and regretting it because I didn't didn't have enough info to make a logical decision for myself. Thanks much! |
Follow-Up Postings:
|
- Posted by buyorsell888 Zone 8 Portland OR (My Page) on Thu, Mar 18, 10 at 15:41
| We dug our first one on a whim back in 1996 and now have about a dozen water features all over the yard. IF you are into gardening, wildlife, fish, the maintenance isn't that bad. Especially if you do it right the first time. That is a big pond which means easier to keep water temps stable but sometimes harder to have enough plants to control algae. If you aren't interested in koi, goldfish are fine in smaller ponds. Koi require significantly more filtration and care and need big ponds that especially are at least three feet deep for proper muscle growth as they swim up and down. Swimming only horizontally does not let their muscles develop evenly and shallow ponds are harder to keep stable. It is really up to you! IF I had space, I'd build a big pond in a heartbeat. |
|
| I'm leaning more and more towards a pond. Just the thought thought of one is appealing. I just want to make sure it isn't something I'll regret at a later date. Sort of like buying a time-share. I just want to make sure I get all the info to "internalize it". Actually, I'll like to hear someone play "Devil's advocate" and try to talk me out of it... just to get a different perspective. Thanks for the reply. |
|
- Posted by DouglasHoover (My Page) on Mon, Mar 25, 13 at 22:31
| PONDLESS OR POND- LINER OR CONCRETE Speaking of the devil...here goes! Even though you have more than likely already finished your project... There is a second important decision to be make besides whether to build a waterfall and pond or a pond-less waterfall. Regardless of which you choose, you need to know whether to construct it with a rubber liner or reinforced concrete .The get-rich-quick factor in the pond liner industry has forced up the price of pond liner kits to equal the cost of concrete construction. If you search for the truth about concrete ponds and waterfalls from reading the literature of the greed-driven liner pond industry, you will not find it. Why? Because if the truth be known, no one in their right mind would invest good, hard-earned money in a pond liner! The pond liner track record speaks for itself: 1. More than 37% of all waterfalls have serious structural damage within 3 years of construction. 2. 57% of homeowners say they are rather unsatisfied with the way their waterfall came out after the project was completed. 3. One in three waterfalls and ponds are leaking water within nine months of completion. 4. 63% of "do-it-yourselfers" say they wished they had the proper information from the "get go" or that they had hired someone. These statistics are from the pond liner industry itself (Bob Wilder, 48-Hour Waterfall). I can confirm and attest to these figures myself. Before retiring I built well over 2000 concrete and rebar waterfalls and ponds over the past 30 years. I have ripped out and replaced dozens of defective pond liners and replaced them with concrete ones with lifetime warranties. Most pond liner guys will not attach more than a one-year warranty. They make no guarantee against rats, mice, ground squirrels, gophers, tree roots and sharp objects. Let's compare apples to lemons... First, let's talk about apples (concrete waterfalls). We will construct a pondless waterfall that is 20 inches wide at the top by 20 feet long, becoming 24 inches wide at the bottom, to create a spillway 3 feet tall. At the bottom is a catch basin 4 ft. x 6 ft. x 3 ft. deep. The costs of excavation are as follows: To dig a waterfall and basin takes two men 4 hours @ $20 per hour = $160. The flexible PVC pipe is 35 ft. @ $1.25 per ft. = $44. TOTAL EXCAVATION COST FOR A CONCRETE POND = $2,236. With this type of construction, no filter is needed. The water in the basin is not exposed to sunlight, so there are no algae. Plus the top layer of rock and the planks are easily removed for cleaning out debris about once a year. If a plastic screen is placed over the planks before the rock layer, cleaning is reduced by 90%. Now let's talk about the lemons (the liner folks). The pondless waterfall liner kit advertised by all the disciples of the "liner messiah" on their websites is $1,940 + tax & shipping, or $2,176. And now for the math: One concrete/rebar construction pondless waterfall completed with high-efficiency Concrete and rebar pondless waterfall has a lifetime warranty. Liner pondless waterfall: 1 yr. warranty on labor, lifetime warranty against factory defect. But there is no warranty whatsoever against holes caused by rats, mice, ground squirrels, gophers, tree roots, sharp objects, etc. Sorry Charlie! Concrete and rebar pondless waterfalls use a high-efficiency above-ground pump that is easy to service (it has a 3 yr. warranty). The 1/3 HP pump is small, very quiet, and easily hidden behind a couple of rocks or plants next to the falls, or piped to another part of the yard. The liner pondless waterfall uses a submersible sump pump that is placed in the bottom of the basin, and then buried with hundreds of pounds of rocks. To service this pump (only a 2 yr. warranty), all the slimy, stinky rocks have to be removed from the basin first. The concrete and rebar pondless waterfall pump produces 5,800 gallons per hour at only 356 watts (retail $429). The liner pondless waterfall kit comes with a sump pump (they advertise as "the best pump on the market"). It produces 5,700 gal/hour (100 gal. less) at a whopping 911 watts of power (over twice that of the above-ground pump). You will pay $525 more per year for electricity (at $.12/kwh) for that extra 555 watts. Their pump costs $600 retail ($171 more than the above-ground). Oh, did I mention "the best warranty in the industry" is only 2 years, compared to 3 years for the above-ground? The concrete and rebar pondless waterfall's rocks are all mortared in place. So anyone, especially small children, can climb on the rocks without them moving, with possible serious injury resulting. With liner pondless waterfalls, rocks will move and shift on their own without help. After a few months, the ugly liner is exposed in the falls and around the pond. While building the concrete pondless waterfall, design liberties can be taken, such as altering the length, width or shape of the feature. With a liner pondless waterfall, the parameters have already been set by the manufacturer of the kit. The concrete pondless waterfall can utilize the large, open basin to install an Aquafill automatic water leveling device. In addition, the basin can be made smaller because the space for water is not taken up by rocks as it is in the liner pondless waterfall basin. The only rock that exists is on top of the galvanized or plastic plank cover. Wow! Concrete waterfalls are stationary, permanent, lifetime life-expectancy, cheaper to build, cheaper to operate, easier to clean, easy to maintain, longer pump warranty, safer and more natural looking! Apples or lemons? You be the judge! I am sick and tired of these amateurs giving my life-long profession a bad name by their exaggerated, dishonest and sensational claims - only to be backed up by a nebulous warranty and, at best, shoddy workmanship. My disclaimer: There are professionals installing liners that do take measures to prevent rodent or root attacks by placing a think layer of mortar under and over the liner. I found that if you are going to go to all that extra work and expense, just build it with 3500 psi concrete to begin with! I you build it with concrete, you can use bottom anti-vortex drains and use an out of pond high efficient pump and don't need to place rocks on the bottom which end up creating a maintenance headache.
|
Here is a link that might be useful: More Concrete Ponds
This post was edited by DouglasHoover on Tue, Mar 26, 13 at 4:45
Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum. If you are a member, please log in. If you aren't yet a member, join now!
Return to the Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum
Instructions
- You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
- Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
- After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
- It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
- HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
- No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
- If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
- If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.