Return to the Roses Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Antibacterial soap as fungicide

Posted by michaelg z6B NC Mts (My Page) on
Mon, Jun 11, 12 at 12:05

This is a mea culpa, since I pooh-pooed this suggestion on the board a couple of weeks ago. Henry Kuska just posted a controlled study that found these soaps effective against blackspot and powdery mildew. They tested some form of Equate and the antibacterial form of Ajax, both containing triclosan, which does, I see, have antifungal properties.

They used a 1.8% solution. This would be 2.5 oz or 5 TB of soap to a gallon of water. They applied the soap every 10 to 14 days. I'd suggest trying Antibacterial Ajax since I'm not such which particular Equate product they used.

Here is a link that might be useful: study


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

Interesting. I look forward to hearing how well it works in actual rose gardens. Like, somewhat effective, very effective, better than nothing, etc.

I wonder, however, if soap of any kind wouldn't be detrimental to insects, both beneficial and non-beneficial?

I do admire you, michaelg, for being able to stand up and admit you make a mistake.

Kate


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

Equate is a Walmart brand, I see on their site that the clear antibacterial hand soap list triclosan as the 1st ingredient. Sounds like something worth trying on a plant or two.


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

Just a couple of points: 1) If you Google triclosan, you'll find it as big a concern for human safety as the usual rose fungicides. 2) I think the chances that triclosan will ever be certified for organic use are zero.


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

Many products and substances will be found effective against many issues. I'm sure motor oil would also knock down fungi and insects, as it IS "oil", but that doesn't make it suitable or safe. Many cultures on earth have for eons and continue to use raw human waste to fertilize crops, but that doesn't make it suitable or safe for our use. While the results are intellectually interesting, they haven't been licensed nor deemed suitable and safe. I stand by my suggestion to use products for their licensed, intended uses. There are far too many chemicals out there which can do irreparable harm to an already stressed system. I honestly don't want the person next door to start dumping and spraying chemicals into MY environment to see what works. Kim


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

DO NOT DO TRY THIS PEOPLE

IT WILL BURN YOUR LEAVES!!! especially at this time of the year with this heat and hot sun

i tried this with three of my rose bushes and almost all of my leaves were burnt! after 2 days in the sun! i washed it off with water the best

I use Sulphur dust now mixed with water


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

Hrose, thank you. Do you remember how much soap you used per gallon?


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

Hrose, the article mentions this possibility on hot sunny days and suggests a concentration reduction. (Michael your similar comment was posted after I wrote this but before I posted this.)

------------------------------------------

Kim, we are not discussing random chemical testing. We are discussing using treatments that have been tested by Ph.D. scientists at Universities, and published in reviewed scientific journals.

---------------------------------------
Mike Rivers, yes, there are concerns about the safety of triclosan. The EPA is reviewing its 2008 reregistration eligibility decision.
http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/REDs/factsheets/triclosan_fs.htm

Concerning your statement: " I think the chances that triclosan will ever be certified for organic use are zero."

By definition I would expect that it would not be eligible for organic use certification even if it was completely safe. Am I misunderstanding what "organic use certification" means?
The organic forum states the following: "This forum is meant for the discussion of organic gardening. Organic gardening is most easily defined as a philosophy that stresses the use of naturally occurring substances and friendly predators and avoiding man-made chemical fertilizers and pesticides. This is the philosophy which guides this forum."

H,Kuska comment: Triclosan, I assume, is man-made.


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

Henry, I appreciate that this is being tested by PhD's, etc. BUT, there are IDIOTS all around us. NO OFFENSE MEANT TO ANY PARTICULAR INDIVIDUALS ON THIS FORUM! A friend's neighbor supposedly read that Tide sprayed on his garden would rid him of white fly. Did wonders for his neighbor's koi pond, too. The effects of anything applied in any fashion to YOUR garden have much farther reaching impact than just to your fence. Too many do dumb things as it is and don't need any "enabling", thank you very much! Kim


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

Kim, did the "A friend's neighbor supposedly read that Tide sprayed on his garden would rid him of white fly" read this in a reviewed published scientific journal article? Did he post the article to a gardening forum so that it could be discussed by others?


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

Henry, I only know the fish died from being "treated" by Tide overspray. The neighbor's "defense" was that he read it worked on white fly. YOU may operate scientifically, but MOST people do not. Kim


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

Henry, a nember of soaps are certified organic by the USDA. Some people, not you of course, might then assume that an antibacterial soap containing triclosan would be an organic treatment for blackspot. My post was telling them that's not the case.


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

Mich

i used 1 tablespoon of antibacterial soap mixed with 1 liter of water it did more damage then the blackspot


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

Kim if you want to start a thread about not using motor oil or not using Tide or not using other chemicals that have not been subject to the the reviewed scientifc literature and have not been discussed in a forum of peers, to supress blackspot, fine. Obviously you have a point.

Personally, I do not spray anything. I do recognize that there is a real need to find safer substitutes for some/many of U.S. "approved" rose fungicides. As a scientist, I can provide information about what has been published in reviewed scientific journals. In this case the paper that Michael mentioned that I had cited was selected by me for another thread ("Organic fungicide that works") because it reported a recent study of a bicarbonate.

For this thread, as Mike Rivers correctly pointed out" If you Google triclosan, you'll find it as big a concern for human safety as the usual rose fungicides."


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

So Hrose got foliar burn using a slightly lower concentration of antibacterial soap than the researchers used (4 vs. 5 TB/gal).


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

Hang on a dad-gummed minute here.....

I've gotten a lot of great advice on this forum and through the collective sharing of its members, found methods that work and those that don't. I believe that most of the information came from people whose real names, credentials, and education backgrounds are concealed behind the anonymity of their forum names and I am CERTAIN that 99% of them haven't been doing tests in laboratory environments or subjecting their findings to a scientific peer review board.

I have also read complete silliness here. The point is that I could claim that drenching my roses in maple syrup makes them not only delicious, but has successfully prevented chili thrips in Illinois.

You can post whatever you want on the internet & if you scream "LOOK AT ME" loud enough, some people [as Kim said] will take your word as gospel. On the other end of the spectrum we have scientists who require hard facts and evidence. I believe the majority of people are somewhere in the middle of those 2 extremes.

In the last year I've seen a number of common household items touted as THE best cure for Omigosh-Fungus-Nightmare-Kill-It-Now, and I guess you can try them if you want, but seriously---I know what happens when I accidentally spill some of those "cures" on items inside or outside the house and I figured the risk was not worth the untested reward. If other folks want to venture into that realm, so be it, but at least fair warning has been given.


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

  • Posted by hoovb z9 Southern CA (My Page) on
    Tue, Jun 12, 12 at 12:31

Would you wash your hair with vinegar? Wash your hands with milk? Wax your car with chapstick?

If one is going to go to all the effort of spraying, and it is WORK to spray, why not use the best product possible, one intended for the job, instead of experimenting with household cleaners? Why waste your time?


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

  • Posted by maryl Z7 Okla. (My Page) on
    Tue, Jun 12, 12 at 12:59

I don't think Michael or Henry are recommending this product to spray with. Just giving out information and speculating on it's effectiveness. That's how we learn - through experimentation. Personally I bit on one of these "natural" remedies a decade or more ago when the baking soda formula first appeared on this forum. It not only defoliated some of my roses, it outright killed a few minis. Later I tried a manufactured product called 'Remedy' that is based on baking soda and had no problems with it. The difference was in trial and error - but carried out by someone who had a financial incentive to get it right. Not some back room yahoo that doesn't have my climate (very, very important) and just "thinks" the formulation sounds right...If you are intent on throwing everything in the pantry at your roses just because you read it on the internet, expect damage and no one to blame (or sue) when your pet monkey collapses and your roses are burned to stumps...Maryl


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

Henry, I agree, I'd rather use a well-researched product where possible, but you and I have a whole different view of most published literature; almost all of it that I review is neither well-designed, truly non-biased, nor a definitive answer...in many fields.

As an author and a reviewer in some of those vaunted "peer-reviewed" literature sources, I'm fully a member of the club that holds that "there is a lot of @#%$#@ (crap) in the literature and I put some of it there"

I wish we had the answers, but for most of the things in life, there is a lot of gray zone.


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

And I should have added...I've seen a lot of PhD's that are idiots as well. Sometimes within their own field. "PhD" sometimes does stand for "piled higher and deeper."


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

professorroush, stated: "you and I have a whole different view of most published literature; almost all of it that I review is neither well-designed, truly non-biased, nor a definitive answer...in many fields."

H.Kuska comment. I do not recall discussing with you my views of most published literature. In this thread please notice that I stated:

"Did he post the article to a gardening forum so that it could be discussed by others?"

And later:

"and have not been discussed in a forum of peers"

This second step (first step being published in a reviewed scientific journal) proved important in this thread, as Mike Rivers pointed out, the present concerns about the safety of triclosan (which once was considered so safe that it was used in toothpastes). See link below.

Here is a link that might be useful: Google search for triclosan and toothpaste


 o
RE: Antibacterial soap as fungicide

It's actually still used in Colgate-Total toothpaste, along with a polymer that keeps it attached to teeth for up to 8 hours. The brand is so lucrative that Colgate is unlikely to remove it until it is forced to by either conclusive research showing harm or new EPA/FDA regulations.


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Roses Forum

Instructions

  • You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
  • HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
  • No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.



 
Click here to learn more about in-text links on this page.