Return to the Antique Roses Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Big, free standing, shade tolerant and thornless (or almost)?

Posted by nikthegreek 9b/10a E of Athens (My Page) on
Tue, Mar 18, 14 at 12:42

Does such a rose exist?
Nik


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Big, free standing, shade tolerant and thornless (or almost)?

Madame Plantier.


 o
RE: Big, free standing, shade tolerant and thornless (or almost)?

yes, it surely does - the helenae hybrid, Lykkefund fits the bill in all ways and you even get clusters of lovely little orange heps.
Goldfinch is another decent rose which, although not entirely thornfree, does not have the pricking spite that many of them do (although it has a fairly short 3-4 week bloom period, it is a good foliage shrub. Aimee Vibert - grown with just a tiny bit of support in its first few years, has a lovely, late blooming habit but will need a little more sun than the other 2....and finally, can I suggest the Hybrid Musk, Moonlight. No, it is not terribly thorn-free but will make a terrific specimen with an even better flowering in autumn than spring....and finally, a small rambler which will grow as a free-standing, very shade tolerant, healthy and more or less completely thorn-free - the Austin rose, Snowgoose..


 o
RE: Big, free standing, shade tolerant and thornless (or almost)?

Aha! And very nice looking too this Madame Plantier. How shade tolerant would you say it is?
Nik

This post was edited by nikthegreek on Tue, Mar 18, 14 at 12:59


 o
RE: Big, free standing, shade tolerant and thornless (or almost)?

Camps, I replied to mad_gallica before seeing your message. Will look into the ones you suggest and come back with questions. Thanks
Nik


 o
RE: Big, free standing, shade tolerant and thornless (or almost)?

Yes--one I seem to be recommending a lot lately: Austin's Mortimer Sackler--light to med. pink. Nearly thornless. It is usually listed as a climber (to 12 ft), but I have grown it for 5-6 years now as a free-standing tall shrub--I just occasionally nip off a the few canes that try to grow taller than 8-9 ft.

I happened to notice yesterday that Austin lists it as shade tolerant in his latest catalog. I've never checked to see how he listed it before. Mine is grown in 6+ hours of sun, however.

Mortimer Sackler



Kate


 o
RE: Big, free standing, shade tolerant and thornless (or almost)?

Nik - you might want to look at Opal Brunner. Although HMF lists it as a short climber, I have two mature bushes (they are over 8 years old) growing in partial shade in my garden (one gets maybe 3 hours of sun), and both have grown into large free standing shrubs. Mine are about 90% thorn free - I had to hunt to find some on them the other day. Blooms in clusters of small pink/peach flowers, so it depends on what style you like.

I think your climate and mine are very similar, so I thought this might work. Roses are probably happier to get some shade in our climates than they would be where the summer sun is less intense.

Jackie


 o
RE: Big, free standing, shade tolerant and thornless (or almost)?

I wonder if Reine des Violettes would qualify. Mine is just a baby so I know very little other than that it's completely thornless and will retain its color better in the shade. Mine does get morning sun but is shaded the remainder of the day. I believe it does get large and suspect if will be free-standing if pruned correctly.

Ingrid


 o
RE: Big, free standing, shade tolerant and thornless (or almost)?

  • Posted by AquaEyes 7 New Brunswick, NJ (My Page) on
    Tue, Mar 18, 14 at 15:08

Also take a look at the Hybrid Musk 'Cornelia'. I don't grow it myself, but was considering it as a climber for a fence. I went with 'Bubble Bath' instead, but that's not thornless.

:-)

~Christopher


 o
RE: Big, free standing, shade tolerant and thornless (or almost)?

Yes, Austin's Brother Cadfael, which is 10 feet tall and almost thorn free. It's definitely free standing with a lovely trumpet vase shape. Its canes, the newer ones at least, are a striking deep wine color. It grows in part shade in the afternoons. Diane


 o
RE: Big, free standing, shade tolerant and thornless (or almost)?

Wow, so many recommendations. I thought I would be lucky if I got one or two! I'll have to study a bit and come back. From a cursory check I'm sure I'll be getting more than one of your suggestions come next season. Of all the roses mentioned I only have Cornelia. Thanks to all. Keep it coming!

Jackie, I'm exactly on the 38th parallel which would make it broadly similar in terms of sun strength to Sacramento Valley CA. The climate is similar to parts of California although one of the main differences is the sea temps. The Med is much warmer than the Pacific if I'm not mistaken which would significantly affect the climate.
Nik

This post was edited by nikthegreek on Tue, Mar 18, 14 at 16:16


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Antique Roses Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.


Learn more about in-text links on this page here