Return to the Antique Roses Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
cl. cramoisi superieur

Posted by jerijen Sunset Z24 (My Page) on
Tue, Jun 24, 14 at 12:55

I have a puzzle here.

This immature plant is clearly a climber. It is clearly a China. It is the correct color to be what it was supposed to be: Cl. Cramoisi Superieur . . .

And yet . . .

It consistently produces blooms which are undeniably single. Not even semi-double. Little, dark red (Darker than shown here )single blooms with vivid golden stamens.

Has anyone ever seen Cl. Cramoisi Superieur do this?


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: cl. cramoisi superieur

While browsing HMF I came upon this photo of the non-climbing variety :-)


 o
RE: cl. cramoisi superieur

Well, I'll be a monkey's uncle.

I have never seen the bush form do that!


 o
RE: cl. cramoisi superieur

I've had what goes around as 'Cl. Cramoisi Superieur' for quite a long time indeed. It's a very fine rose! Anyway, mine is own-root, should that enter into the question. But never has mine thrown a single blossom in all its many years. The peculiarity that I've noticed is that sometimes a particular branch's flowers will each form a hip; but generally the plant as a whole is hipless.


 o
RE: cl. cramoisi superieur

Well, that's what I thought, Brent. ALL of the photos I can find of Cl CS are quite double, and look much like the blooms of the bush form.

I DO think this own-root plant wants to be a climber, and if it will bloom well, I will keep it, but I just can't help thinking it is misidentified.

And, it was a passalong-passalong. So I can't even go back to a nursery to question it.

If it keeps blooming single-to-semi-double, I'll maybe just give it a study name, and not worry about it. (I looked at last year's photos, and it was blooming semi-double, then.


 o
RE: cl. cramoisi superieur

  • Posted by zjw727 Coastal Oregon Zone (My Page) on
    Thu, Jun 26, 14 at 20:10

Jeri, the second picture, above, is stunning. That color! The petals look like velvet!!!


 o
RE: cl. cramoisi superieur

Yes. It's stunning -- but I just cannot believe it is really Cl. Cramoisi Superieur. For one thing, these blooms are really, really tiny.

I think we'll give it a few more months, to see what it can do . . .


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Antique Roses Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Please review our Rules of Play before posting.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.


Learn more about in-text links on this page here