Return to the Antique Roses Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Lichfield Angel or Windermere?

Posted by vickysgarden 5 (My Page) on
Sat, Jul 6, 13 at 9:22

I am considering adding one of these David Austin roses, and was wondering which do you think would be better, Lichfield Angel or Windermere? Think in terms of how long the blooms last before shattering, health, overall look of the bush, frequency of blooms and quantity of blooms, etc. They both appear to be beautiful in their pictures posted here and on HMF!


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Lichfield Angel or Windermere?

Hi Vicky ... good to hear from you in Chicagoland! I asked The Dark Lady about Windermere .. she likes it a lot, has 7 of them in her VA garden... great scent, blooms a lot.

Then I saw another person wrote on how fast Windermere shatters ... not good for the vase!


 o
RE: Lichfield Angel or Windermere?

Thanks, Strawberry...yes, that's what I read, too, about Windermere. That's the way my Mary Rose, Winchester Cathedral, and Redoute tend to be...blooms are beautiful for about a day, and then they shatter in your hand. Lady of Megginch, on the other hand, looks good for about a week on the bush....no shattering of petals. At least that's the way it's been so far this summer...and the summer here has been cool, the coolest in about 45 years, the paper said.

Any other thoughts on these 2 roses?


 o
RE: Lichfield Angel or Windermere?

  • Posted by hoovb z9 Southern CA (My Page) on
    Sat, Jul 6, 13 at 14:31

I have both.

For every flower 'Lichfield Angel' produces, 'Windermere' produces 100.

They both have superior resistance to rust, probably not an issue for you. When I do get black spot, neither of them gets it, so they probably have some resistance--how much I can't say, but perhaps they are slightly better than some roses there.

'Windermere' has a beautiful fragrance, LA almost none.

LA has an arching growth habit, wider than tall, while 'Windermere' is taller than wide, and quite tall.

'Windermere' the flowers are quite ephemeral, but if you have a cool spring the flowers can last three days. Two in summer. LA's flowers last quite a long time for an Austin, 5-6-7 depending on temperatures.

'Windermere' blooms a lot, I think the disadvantage is that you must deadhead constantly because of the short life of the flower. Really delicious fragrance though--not quite as good as 'Jude The Obscure', but anything that comes near to 'Jude' in fragrance is very good indeed.


 o
RE: Lichfield Angel or Windermere?

Thanks much, Hoov...that is just the kind of information I wanted. It sounds like you may prefer Windermere (?) A hundred times more blooms is quite a few more! Could you compare the color of the bloom and the size of the bloom....are they about the same size and similar in color? Pictures seem to show them both to be a pale apricot paling to white.


 o
RE: Lichfield Angel or Windermere?

  • Posted by hoovb z9 Southern CA (My Page) on
    Sun, Jul 7, 13 at 16:15

LA has fairly large blooms, between 3 & 4", closer to 4. Windermere's are about 2.75" wide. LA has mostly a ivory color--once in a while in cool weather a more pale apricot, but mostly ivory, like 'French Lace'. 'Windermere' is more consistently pale apricot fading to ivory.

I love the fragrance of 'Windermere' so prefer it for that reason. Smells so good. Deadheading is a daily chore, however. LA is more of an also-ran in the garden. Of course, YMMV in zone 5 vs. 9b.


 o
RE: Lichfield Angel or Windermere?

Thanks! That is just the kind of information I wanted to get. I am leaning towards getting Windermere, and you have helped me make up my mind. I like the idea of more blooms, even if they are slightly smaller. This forum is a great resource--thanks so much!


 o
RE: Lichfield Angel or Windermere?

Just to chime in about Windermere...

it does shatter, greatly. I can use it for cut flowers if I cut before they open, and try not to jostle it too much after that. But the smell is divine! I love the crisp citrus and warm fruity fragrance. I consider it a fairly strong smell, and very enchanting. Can't help you with LA...but for W, the overall bush shape (and density, which is a big plus for me) I'd give it an A+, along with uniqueness of smell (while I love that old rose smell, Windermere is a nice counterpart to the heavy old rose fragrance). Health is an A+, too. I never have trouble with, beyond a bit of rust/bs in extremely wet rainy weather.
Must add, though, that I deadhead it religiously, which it seems to love. The first flush is a sight to see, covering the whole of the bush and it reblooms well afterwards.
In my garden, Windermere is fairly consistent in color--a really warm, creamy white, with hints of apricot. I used to have it beside Iceberg, and it made Iceberg's white-white flowers look dull and grayish (and W even more lovely :)


 o
RE: Lichfield Angel or Windermere?

Thank you! I am feeling better and better about my choice of Windermere! I don't have any problem with rust in my climate, and deadheading is fine, too, I'm used to it.

Sometimes when 2 roses look very similar on pictures, it is really helpful to hear from those who have actually grown them. Thanks much.


 o
RE: Lichfield Angel or Windermere?

I want to thank all of you too. You've helped me decide that I would like Lichfield Angel for myself in zone 6b. Although she may not produce as many blooms as Windermere, her flowers last longer, she requires less deadheading, and she seems to have a more rounded shape, which pleases me. I am not as interested in having lots of roses as I am interested in having shapely shrubs with beautiful foliage that just happen to produce pretty roses. But that's just me. So thanks again for your comments above!


 o
RE: Lichfield Angel or Windermere?

I want to thank all of you too. You've helped me decide that I would like Lichfield Angel for myself in zone 6b. Although she may not produce as many blooms as Windermere, her flowers last longer, she requires less deadheading, and she seems to have a more rounded shape, which pleases me. I am not as interested in having lots of roses as I am interested in having shapely shrubs with beautiful foliage that just happen to produce pretty roses. But that's just me. So thanks again for your comments above!


 o
RE: Lichfield Angel or Windermere?

  • Posted by hoovb z9 Southern CA (My Page) on
    Sat, Oct 18, 14 at 10:44

LA may actually be a lot better for you Mountie in your shorter growing season. Here some of the Austins realize it never gets cold and they get really big and lazy about blooming. Where you are that has a real winter--they are more motivated.

I was just out yesterday sniffing and sniffing 'Windermere'. The fragrance really is wonderful. A strong citrus but with a layer of spice and a layer of old rose underneath. Mmmmmm!


 o
RE: Lichfield Angel or Windermere?

Hi Hoovb, I wonder if you could tell me how long you have had your LA and what its dimensions are?

I bought mine just over twelve months ago from a local supplier of DA roses - FWIW, she said that all her stock is two year old grafted. We had no real Winter this year but in Spring, LA was a blooming machine, unfortunately though, Spring was warm and wet as was Summer. Poor LA has continued to bloom but is constantly affected by black spot - it's not the only one - this year all my roses have had black spot when previously they have been clean.

I'm wondering whether I should move LA because it's planted close to (within 1.5 metres) of Buff Beauty and BB has decided it's going to take over the world. My LA is already quite a large plant but its growth is becoming very lopsided because of BB planted above it.

I know that the Austin catalogue says LA is 4ft x 3ft but mine is already larger than that. I thought that, as you're in zone 9 I might get an idea from you as to what I should expect.

I'm attaching a photo of my LA and in the background you can see all the bamboo poles I've hammered into the ground to try and get BB to behave itself, however, I'm fighting a losing battle with BB so I believe that I'll have to move one of them and LA is the least difficult (or, at least, I think it won't be as hard as trying to move BB).

BTW, I tried unsuccessfully to buy Windermere from David Austin in the UK and from any number of DA resellers in Europe. It would seem that the US, Australia and New Zealand are the only countries where it can now be obtained.

Cheers
Tricia


 o
RE: Lichfield Angel or Windermere?

  • Posted by hoovb z9 Southern CA (My Page) on
    Sat, Oct 18, 14 at 18:38

Tricia, mine got to about 5x4 and did not venture much beyond that. It had a nice rounded shape. I got rid of it this past spring, as it just never bloomed that much for me. I gave it 6 or 7 years.

Yours is so lovely in that photo. Mine would have a spring like that, but only one or two flowers at any one time for the rest of the year. The growing season is too long here for that.


 o
RE: Lichfield Angel or Windermere?

Hoovb, thank you so much for your reply. 5 x 4 means I should dig it up this Winter and move it because I've just gone out (into the very thick fog) to measure mine - it's been in the ground just over 12 months and is 1 metre x 1 metre wide (a bit more than 3 feet in each direction). I have a feeling that it has a lot of growing left to do.

I'm sure that I'm Zone 9 equivalent (very seldom does it snow in Winter and the coldest minimum is around -5 C, Summer is usually very dry and hot with weeks of temperatures over 35 degrees). This year, however, Summer was wet, humid and very mild - a disaster for the roses - they've all succumbed to black spot to one degree or another, however, it doesn't seem to have affected their vigour or their ability to flower. Lichfield Angel was spectacular in Spring (May) - the photo above was in Summer (early July) - it is seldom without several flowers and, at the moment has lots of new growth and buds - I really don't know what to make of the seasons any more!

I feel so sorry for Ingrid when I read her posts - I know what it's like to try and garden with no water - I watched my mother garden in droughts for many years. It would be very perverse of me to complain that we've had so much rain in the past twelve months that we're about double the average annual rainfall (and Autumn is when we normally expect most of our rain).

Tricia


 o
RE: Lichfield Angel or Windermere?

  • Posted by hoovb z9 Southern CA (My Page) on
    Sun, Oct 19, 14 at 16:50

Double the average annual rainfall...sounds heavenly!


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Antique Roses Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Please review our Rules of Play before posting.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.


Learn more about in-text links on this page here