Return to the Antique Roses Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Marchesa Boccella

Posted by mauvegirl8 Texas (My Page) on
Sun, Sep 1, 13 at 15:47

Buds opened this Sunday morning.
Is this Marchessa Boccella?


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

The powder pink petals have a certain glow or luminosity

This post was edited by mauvegirl8 on Mon, Sep 2, 13 at 1:17


 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

I can see Marchesa Boccella from my bedroom window.
A cup of coffee & roses is all you need every morning.

This post was edited by mauvegirl8 on Mon, Sep 2, 13 at 1:19


 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

I am poring through HMF and garden blogs regarding Marchesa Boccella.
What are your experiences?


 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

Your rose looks like the real thing. Marchesa Bocella is also known by the name Jacques Cartier. It got this name after the Duchess of Portland (Eng.), who "discovered," it in Italy, and renamed it with a "suitable" name for English speaking people.

By whichever name it is called, it is one of my favorite roses. I have a young bush in my garden, here in W. PA, but in a large public rose garden not far from me, there used to be some magnificent, mature MBs. I say used to be, because they were brutally dug out with no intention of saving or moving them to make way for hybrid teas a couple years ago.

These beauties were 15+ years old at the time of their destruction. Due to being grafted on multiflora rootstock (I was there when they were first planted, purchased from Pickering, Canada), I believe they developed a rather impressive trunk. It was about 5" in diameter, actually had bark on it, and started branching at about 10" from the ground. The trunk was not the multiflora rootstock, but Marchesa Bocella since Pickering's rootstocks are only about an inch or two long, due to using expert Belgian grafters for all their grafting, unlike the sloppy US grafters who make 6-8+" rootstocks putting the roots too low in the soil, IMHO. No basal growth ever came forth from these MBs and as they matured they looked more and more like miniature crab apple trees! I do not expect mine to grow a trunk, but time will tell.

In W. PA they maxed out at about 4' tall, and 2 1/2' wide, rather vertical in growth habit as is mine at home which is on its own roots and not grafted. Yous may get considerably larger there in Texas. I have seen MB in another public garden grow rather lax and sprawling in habit, but this could be due to less than ideal cultural practices like growing in too much shade.

The foliage is somewhat limp looking which is not an indication it needs watering. This habit is natural for MB.

The flowers med./lt. pink color gets lighter in hot weather, as well as the flower size diminishing from the heat. Quartered (rather, fifths instead of fourths), petal segments are seen as the flower opens. Mine blooms all summer, usually in tight bunches of up to five buds, so be careful deadheading so that consecutive buds are not removed with the deadhead. MB's flowers are short necked with the foliage beginning right below the flower. Some people consider this an undesirable trait, but I find it part of this rose's charm, as it if is trying to hide the flower from anyone who is not willing to search it out, making the effort well worth it. The scent is heavenly.

MB takes to heavy pruning in the spring very nicely, and is really one of the most manageable OGRs there is, unlike some OGRs that must be left to "do their own thing."

As far as disease and insect problems, this rose is one of the most dependable and toughest roses around. Getting BS with out any spraying only very late in the season, or under very severe growing conditions, like this year's miserable conditions locally, for example. Mine should rebound very well once cooler weather comes after mid-September.

That's about all on Marchesa Bocella. I hope you enjoy yours as much as I do mine.


 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

Why do you ask? Because no, it doesn't look right. I'm not willing to positively state that the differences aren't from being in very different climates, but the flower form is looser, the foliage is much lighter, and less distinctive.

The big ID clue for this one is the buds. They should look like a bug bit the end off for a day or two before they open.


 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

The first picture, I thought 'yep, for sure'....but doubt set in by the time I got to the end. The leaves on JC (or MB) are very matte, even slightly rough (although that could be my less than tender care) and Mads is right, the buds are really distinctive - looking impossibly small and .....grizzled? a bit. A very pure classic rose scent - like old ladies face cream from C1940 (Yardley's foundation cream - the scent of my nan).

This is one tough rose. Mine started life in one of those wicker
shopping carts (carrying on the old lady theme ) where it stayed a decent size for several years but always looked so pitiful. I popped it in a galvanised dustbin for another couple of years (where the roots got regularly boiled) until guilt made me finally plant it at the allotment (it was the first one I planted there)
In truth, I don't really like it much - it is not a graceful rose by any means and I have been scared to lavish love and care on it because my allotment neighbour has one (I will take a photo, even though it is between bloom cycles) which is immense. Like some gnarly old oak, it is easily 4m high and wide (it looks even more gigantic because she has a titchy tiny little De Meaux next to it (well underneath, practically). It definitely has a trunk, Thorntorn(great name). I think the ridiculously short petioles and the very congested foliage also bug me a bit. I am useless at this sort of ID but MB/JC is a distinctive rose (and yep, pretty lax - mine is lolling drinkenly on the brassica frame. Whilst the main cane is trunk like, all the branching laterals keep a ropy flexibility, like wisteria.


 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

Because I never ordered Marchesa Boccella.
I ordered Comte de Chambord. I received a tiny band and
these are the 1st blooms. Is it Comte de Chambord?


 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

Ah, I see. Well, I am not going to swear by it but they not wildly dissimilar roses - certainly both lurking around the neglected Portland class. The colour of MB blooms are pretty consistent throughout the rose, while CdC has a tendency to deeper colour in the centre and has slightly larger flowers with a far less pronounced petal inturning towards a button eye than MB. I expect someone more knowledgeable than me would be more decisive and clear.


 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

I also grow Marchessa Bocella. It's difficult to ID a rose based on pics. Mine seems to have less petals. The petals are not so tight. I think. The foliage is also more pale; but that could be due to soil conditions.
Like others have mentioned, one great tough ol' rose.
Heck I even named my St Bernard after her.
Love her scent too..no not the sent of the St. Bernard. Well you get it.


 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

I'll stick with the Marchesa. The pink is not deep more powderpuff.
Also the color is even, no dark center. Lastly, another poster had received her instead of Chambord from same vendor. Likely, the same happened to me. It is beautiful!


 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

IMHO, it looks like Marchesa Boccella. I don't think it's Comte de Chambord.


 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

Thornton, I'd be interested in reading the source for your history of the rose in question. My understanding is that there were two different roses: 'Marquise Boccella', bred by Desprez and released by Cochet in 1842, and 'Jacques Cartier', bred and released by Moreau-Robert in 1868. The two have flowers which are seemingly identical; but 'Marquise Boccella' was remarked as having "habit dwarf--more so than any of the preceding [referring to a group which includes 'La Reine', 'Baronne Prevost', and 'Duchesse de Sutherland']", while 'Jacques Cartier', like most of the other Damask Perpetuals from the line of such bred by Vibert then Robert then Robert & Moreau then Moreau-Robert, successors in the same firm, easily reaches six feet and more, whether own-root or grafted. This of the Duchess of Portland being involved is also news to me, and I'd like to read more about it. Thanks!


 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

Thornton, maybe it is something I did in planting, but I ordered 5 Portlands from Pickering last year, and I have had to cut off multiflora suckers from two of them.


 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

Pickering sells "Jacques Cartier", classes it as a Damask Portland and gives the origin: Desprez, 1868 and lists other names: Marchessa Bocella, Marquise Bocella.

Rogue sells Jacques Cartier and Marchesa Bocella as two different roses, JC listed as Portland / Moreau-Robert and MB as Hybrid Perpetual / Desprez.

Has anyone purchased these roses from either source and if so could you describe what you have, and perhaps offer opinions relative to the debate of which rose is which?

Mauvegirl, do you mind saying where you purchased your rose?

Thanks,
Di


 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

I purchased mine from Rogue. It was listed as Marchessa Bocella. It looks similar to Mauve Girl's pic but not exact. No camera here.


 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

It looks similar to mine, but mine has looser inner petals and not as much pronounced button eye in the center.


 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

We got our Jacques Cartier from Pickering in the early 1980s. I have not seen it in a few years but remember it as similar to Lorie Elf's. Its blossom looked a little messier than Comte de Chambord but over all Jacques was better, blooming more and the better plant. IIRC it was sold as a bourbon which makes me believe that it was the Portland and not the hybrid perpetual. Both were quite fragrant and similar in fragrance.

Cath


 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

This is a funny memory . . .

Back in the late 1980's, we ordered 'Marchesa Boccella' from Hortico. The plant came, and was planted, and grew vigorously.

It bloomed, but MAN! It KEPT growing vigorously. It grew long, lax canes which went up, arched over, and trailed along the ground, in a vine-like fashion.

I described it to Syl Arena, and on one of his trips down here, he stopped by to see it -- and got to experience its nasty habit of wrapping itself around the ankles of un-wary passers-by.

Syl thought, and I agreed, that the bloom sure looked like Marchesa -- but the plant was something quite else.

We finally dug her up, because she really wasn't garden-friendly -- so I don't know whatthehell she was -- other than strange. But it does go to show, there are some things around in the Old Rose world that are flat strange.

Jeri


 o
RE: Marchesa Boccella

Heirloom Roses


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Antique Roses Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Please review our Rules of Play before posting.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.


Learn more about in-text links on this page here