|
| Hello! Seems like I've been posting quite a lot here lately. XD Anyway, I posted this on the Rose ID forum but there's been no replies on it for two days so I'm posting it here in case you Antique Rose experts can help me confirm if this rose is a China or a Tea, or if it's even one of those two at all. Ok, here's my description of this rose: You don't really need to tell me its name, just if it's a China or a Tea, but if you can tell me its name, then I'd very much appreciate it too. :D |
Follow-Up Postings:
|
- Posted by Resolute_Noir 11 (tropical) (My Page) on Fri, Nov 22, 13 at 5:27
|
| Tea. |
|
- Posted by Resolute_Noir 11 (tropical) (My Page) on Fri, Nov 22, 13 at 9:20
| Ok Tea it is! Thank you! :D (To be honest, I was actually starting to think that it was Old Blush/Parson's Pink China) Now before I go, I'd like to ask. What exactly differentiates a Tea from a China? I know Chinas are more on the Crimson and Red side while the Teas are on the paler side of the spectrum but what's the most noticeable difference between them? |
This post was edited by Resolute_Noir on Fri, Nov 22, 13 at 11:20
|
| That's a tough question. There are Teas I will always think of as Chinas. And there are a couple of roses that are officially Bourbons, which I think of as Chinas. GENERALLY speaking, I'd say that Teas get to be taller, but are less twiggy-bushy. Their flowers are larger, too. A picture being worth a thousand words, here's a "typical" Tea Rose plant, and a "typical" China Rose plant. Jeri |
|
| The lines are blurred. There are Chinas which exemplify the light, airy, twiggy shape we expect of them. There are Teas which can become big shrubs. But if you go back to the original Chinas and Teas, the differences between them were much more subtle -- for example, today many would call "Bermuda Spice" a China, but that's what the earliest Teas were like. Generally, the Teas were more fragrant, had more subtle coloring, and had drooping flowers -- but both were light, airy, twiggy shrubs. As those early Teas were bred with Noisettes and Bourbons, they gained size and heft in their canes -- and also often developed larger flowers. To see the Tea Rose picture posted by Jeri, you'd likely think "how did something like that descend from something like "Bermuda Spice"? Well, look at pictures of the cane structures of some of the big Bourbons and you'll see something familiar. Compare the growth habits of Teas and Chinas with Bourbons and Noisettes as shown by Vintage Gardens in these links: Teas Chinas Bourbons Noisettes These later Teas were also bred back with Chinas, blurring the lines again after the two groups were diverging. Generally, if the flower had the desired "Tea-form" and "Tea-fragrance", they were sold as Teas. Those which didn't (even if one or both parents were Teas) were sold as Chinas. As examples, 'Mme Laurette Messimy' and the closely-related 'Comtesse du Cayla' are usually called Chinas, but by heritage, they are really Teas. It's just that they didn't fit as much into the ideal of "what a Tea should be" at the time, and were sold as Chinas. If you look through the Chinas and Teas listed by Vintage Gardens in the links above, you'll find a few others that aren't clearly one or the other. So to answer your question, it's easy to do if the rose is at one end of the Tea or China spectrum, but there's an overlapping area between them. If you see large, drooping flowers starting as pointed buds, subtle color changes shifting between pink and cream and yellow shades, catch a fragrance, and the plant develops fewer but hefty canes from which new growth branches out, you have a Tea. If it has small flowers which don't hang heavily, more clearly pink or red, with not much in the way of fragrance (but if there is, it smells like candy), and the plant grows thin, twiggy canes in all directions, you have a China. But you'll find a bunch of roses which have some characteristics of both groups, in which case your answer will depend on how the rose was classed when it was introduced. :-) ~Christopher |
|
| Jean Bach Sisley, Le Vesuve and Cels Multiflora are further examples of the Tea versus China differentiation, and I don't know that anyone can say definitively that they're one or the other. Cels Multiflora's leaves and growth habit are to me completely China and yet it's classified as a Tea. I've seen Le Vesuve put in the China category in some nursery catalogs and as a Tea in others. The same goes for Jean Bach Sisley. Perhaps we should just call them Tea/China hybrids and call it good. Ingrid |
|
- Posted by Resolute_Noir 11 (tropical) (My Page) on Fri, Nov 22, 13 at 20:49
| So the line are often blurred huh. I'm surprised that the two classes haven't merged into one class. Anyway, thanks for the info everyone! From what you've all said, Teas often have larger, droopier flowers, a noticeable fragrance, and taller growth habit while Chinas have smaller flowers that don't droop too much, are less scented, and spread more thin growth everywhere. |
|
| Not "droop." They NOD. And, some Chinas nod. Jeri |
|
| Yes, I suppose there is a negative connotation attached to the word "droop" which I didn't intend to convey, so let's say "nod". I actually like how the flowers face out or down, so please don't think I was disparaging that characteristic of Teas. I think that more Teas nod than Chinas simply because more Teas have larger flowers than most Chinas, but both have "weak necks". It's just that the "weak necks" are strong enough for the smaller flowers of most Chinas that they can face more up or out, and not "nod" to the same degree as the larger flowers on many Teas. Most rose classes have gray areas, as roses were hybridized outside their classes. When we think of Albas and Damasks, we characterize each class by the growth habits which describe most of them. But there are some that blur the lines there as well -- for example, 'Koenigen van Danemark' (or however it's spelled...) and 'Belle Amour' have characteristics of both classes. Perhaps because there are fewer extant roses in these classes it's easier to draw borders around them. But as people bred Teas and Chinas, they often sought more variation by crossing them with other roses. If the resulting plants were still "Tea-enough" or "China-enough" then they were called that. It's hard to imagine, considering how few original Teas and Chinas made it to Europe, that all the variation we see in roses in these classes now could have arisen WITHOUT outcrossing to other groups. And we see evidence of it today -- "Sophie's Perpetual" looks like a China, but the flowers smell like a Bourbon. 'Papa Gontier' and its seedling 'Lady Hillingdon' are called Teas, but they're triploid -- and looking far back enough, you can find a Hybrid Perpetual ancestor. I think this happened more than we realize today, as breeders tried to expand the colors of Teas into the red shades. There are also Hybrid Perpetuals with Tea ancestors, so things went both ways. For a long time, the offspring more clearly leaned one way or the other, and it wasn't until continued back and forth breeding occurred that truly intermediate roses resulted -- and Hybrid Teas arose as a new class for them. But this isn't cause for eliminating the classes. The generalities of each class will still apply to the majority of the roses in them. When it comes to the "line blurring" individuals, simply take note of the characteristics which apply to that particular rose when making decisions about how to grow the plant. Yes, some Chinas were put in the class because their flowers weren't up to "Tea-status", but if they grow like Teas, then treat them like Teas. And vice versa. :-) ~Christopher |
|
- Posted by Resolute_Noir 11 (tropical) (My Page) on Sat, Nov 23, 13 at 2:51
| I think the nodding (there I used it. :D) is actually the most charming feature of the Teas. It's also a boon to me since their nodding flowers allow me to take macro "water drop lens" photos of them with my front-facing tablet camera. (Basically I have to balance a tiny water drop on the surface of my camera lens to get nice magnified photos, and since the flowers face down towards the camera, I get the best results.) Also, one thing I've noticed about my Tea is that its reverse has a kind of pearl-like sheen. The nodding trait helps to show it off even more. |
|
| And then, there is the fact that in mild climates, Tea Roses will become quite tall -- the nodding blooms, then, are perfectly-placed for your maximum viewing pleasure. :-) We don't think of them as having "weak necks." We think of them as having a grace that the rigidly-upright Hybrid Tea Roses cannot achieve -- exemplified by 'Duchesse de Brabant,' below: Jeri |
|
| aquaeyes, I have really enjoyed your descriptions of Tea roses, and China roses. This is a rather long posting, because I felt the issue of the "weak necked Tea" must be addressed with clarity by those who know and grow them. I've noted how each of the blooms on a Tea rosebush typically changes position: 3 times. Position #1: Tulip flower position. Position #3 Blue bell position. Each and every blossom on a typical Tea rose, starts out in the blue bell position, goes on to open fully and shows its full face as the pedicle moves forwards, then finally finishes in the blue bell position. The Tea rose class has the advantage of showing THE ENTIRE FLOWER during a bloom cycle, from upright bud changing to full face view, to the bluebell nod. Lux. For those who have never seen a Tea rosebush in bloom or live in a cold climate, they might agree with some who write about "weak necks of Tea roses" as if this were a bad thing. It is a magnificent thing. sorry no time to edit, Luanne needs me to mash the spuds, sorry its so long. |
|
| WHAT SHE SAID!! "For those who have never seen a Tea rosebush in bloom or live in a cold climate, they might agree with some who write about "weak necks of Tea roses" as if this were a bad thing. It is a magnificent thing. " *** THANK YOU, LUX. So, REALLY -- If you're discussing Tea Roses ... PLEASE just don't use the phrase: "weak necks." Jeri |
|
- Posted by melissa_thefarm NItaly (My Page) on Sun, Nov 24, 13 at 0:18
| I'm loving this discussion: thanks, everybody, for your valuable comments! Christopher and Lux in particular (collaboration rocks!!) As far as the original pictured rose is concerned, does anyone have an idea what variety it might be? keeping in mind that blooms on baby plants can be different from those on mature roses? I too said "Tea" as soon as I saw the photo, but the flower looks totally unfamiliar. Melissa |
|
- Posted by Resolute_Noir 11 (tropical) (My Page) on Sun, Nov 24, 13 at 1:02
| To me, the nodding of teas make it look somewhat graceful and demure. Almost like it's being humble, unlike Hybrid Teas which seem to look snobbish, yet upright and confident. I like both types. Each have their own charm. Also, weak-necked, or nodding, each are correct in their own standpoints. If looking at a biological perspective, weak-necked is an accurate description because the pedicels are soft and unable to support the weight of the flower. In an aesthetic point of view, nodding is more acceptable because it describes how the flower looks to the observer and also invokes positive connotations about the flower. |
|
| Again, I apologize if I conveyed a negative connotation with "weak-necked". I want to say that I LOVE TEAS! I assumed I couldn't grow them here, but was encouraged to try a couple by pics posted by Stephen Scanniello (who lives just a tad south of me in Barnegat, NJ) of some Teas he put in clients' gardens in this general area. Had I found this out before I placed most of my rose orders, I'd have gotten a few more, but I was running out of room. I'll definitely start collecting them in ten years when I move down to Florida and plan my dream garden/aviaries/menagerie. So I have to emphatically agree with all the praise Luxrosa laid upon the class. The negatives about "weak-necks" and "drooping flowers" came from exhibitors who wanted their show-blooms to face upward for judging. In the garden, we view plants from different angles, and big plants are at an advantage when their flowers face out or down. That's why I wanted 'Jaune Desprez' to climb my Japanese maple -- I wanted to look up from below and see the flowers facing me. And from the little experience with the few I have already, I notice that flowers facing out or down are less damaged by rain -- the water just rolls off the outer petals. But ultimately, I enjoy the variations in roses I'm able to grow here. I think that we in the middle zones 7 and 8 can be lucky in that we get enough cold for the old European roses, but not so cold that the Chinas and Teas would die. True, the Chinas and Teas aren't growing to their full potential, and the old Europeans do have to deal with hot and humid Summers, but I like the idea that I have 'Lady Hillingdon' growing just several feet away from 'Quatre Saisons Blanc Mousseaux'. The differences make for an interesting association. BTW (and this is very off-topic), but do any of you in the warmer zones (9 or 10) have interests in aviary birds? One of my future projects is having huge walk-in planted aviaries, and I think they'd be beautiful with climbing Teas and Tea-Noisettes using them as trellises. I've seen some very interesting designs based on greenhouse frames, using wire mesh instead of plastic. Roses planted inside would attract aphids, which are relished by many species of captive finches -- a mutually beneficial situation. If you're on facebook, check out the page for the parrot sanctuary called Project Perry -- lots of pics of their planted African Grey Aviary. If not, check out their regular page. And see how another parrot sanctuary, Cockatoo Rescue, has planned out a beautiful garden around their aviaries. OK, the parrots would probably chew the roses to shreds (I know my Sammy LOVES when I bring in dead-heading trimmings for him to destroy), but a finch or softbill aviary could be really beautiful when draped with climbing roses....no? :-) ~Christopher https://www.facebook.com/pages/Project-Perry/144608394309 http://projectperry.org/ http://cockatoorescue.org/ |
Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum. If you are a member, please log in. If you aren't yet a member, join now!
Return to the Antique Roses Forum
Information about Posting
- You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
- Please review our Rules of Play before posting.
- Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
- After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
- Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
- We have a strict no-advertising policy!
- If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
- If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.
Learn more about in-text links on this page here









