Return to the Shrubs Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
shrub ID

Posted by zelda77 5 (My Page) on
Tue, Aug 19, 14 at 18:48

This shrub has the characteristics of Rhamnus genus and has been identified in the past as California coffeeberry, buckthorn and honeysuckle. Leaves are opposite. Flowers in spring and flowers are whiteish, very tiny and barely visible, no photo available. Berries start as green, bell or trapezoid shaped, then turn red and get rounded, finally turning dark purple or black and round. Bark is smooth, dark brown. Leaves are oval, sometimes very finely toothed, slightly glossy. Shrub is about 6-8 feet tall. It came with a 40 year old house but no one knows when it was planted. No one in the area who has seen it can provide a positive identification. I have more photos of berries and leaves but can't get multiple photos to upload. Can anyone help with an ID?

This post was edited by zelda77 on Tue, Aug 19, 14 at 19:01


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: shrub ID

  • Posted by hoovb z9 Southern CA (My Page) on
    Tue, Aug 19, 14 at 19:09

Is it either of these? (see link). Zone 5 seems a little cold for R. californica

Here is a link that might be useful: common vs. glossy buckthorn

This post was edited by hoovb on Tue, Aug 19, 14 at 19:21


 o
RE: shrub ID

Thanks hoovb, I thought it was too cold here for R. Californica and the stem color doesn't seem right, but have never seen one except in books. I clicked the link and it didn't work, will try again.


 o
RE: shrub ID

  • Posted by hoovb z9 Southern CA (My Page) on
    Tue, Aug 19, 14 at 19:22

I"m very sorry Zelda, I might have messed up the link when I cut and pasted. My keyboard does things I do not expect. I updated the link, try again. Sorry!

Here is a link that might be useful: Another buckthorn id page

This post was edited by hoovb on Tue, Aug 19, 14 at 19:24


 o
RE: shrub ID

Thanks hoovb, I think after looking at the information in that link that it is glossy buckthorn. I have not been able to find any tip end thorns, just a little nub where one would be, and the glossy doesn't have the thorn. I did a bunch of Google searches and didn't turn up the information you supplied. Garden Web members are a wonderful resource. Thanks again.


 o
RE: shrub ID

It doesn't look like glossy buckthorn to me, and I have lots of it. If nothing else, the fruits or whatever a the ends of the branches look like nothing I've seen on my glossy buckthorn, but the leaves aren't quite right either in shape and veining.

Adding additional posts with photos would help. Just scroll to the bottom of this thread and post a follow-up. If you do two in a row, you need to change the Subject of posting, otherwise the website thinks you posted twice in a row by accident.


 o
RE: shrub ID

Thanks nhbabs, it's good to hear from someone who actually has the glossy buckthorn. I've read that the color of the inner bark is diagnostic - is that your experience?


 o
RE: shrub ID

Here's another photo. Could this be cotoneaster?


 o
RE: shrub ID

I think that the best place to post these photos would be on the Name that Plant forum. It's not cotoneaster, which has tiny leaves, but the folks on name that plant are whizzes at plant ID.

I haven't really looked at the inner bark on buckthorn, but the roots are definitely bright gold-orange, so it would make sense that the inner bark would be too.

Here is a link that might be useful: Name that Plant forum


 o
RE: shrub ID

  • Posted by bboy USDA 8 Sunset 5 WA (My Page) on
    Sat, Aug 23, 14 at 17:44

Definitely a cotoneaster, something that was apparent in the first photo. One on the order of Peking cotoneaster (there are around 400 species).


 o
RE: shrub ID

Thanks bboy and nhbabs. I will follow up your suggestion and post a photo on name that plant. As the root and inner bark color are supposedly diagnostic for glossy buckthorn, tomorrow I'll take a look at them too. I do appreciate the help and suggestions and identification. You are wonderful resources.


 o
RE: shrub ID

I wouldn't bother with checking inner bark. Bboy is really good at plant ID and there is no way that those fruits are buckhorn which has small dark berries.

I only have experience with a very few cotoneasters, so ignore my comment about them.


 o
RE: shrub ID

My first impression was Cotoneaster , but not a variety I'm familiar with.
Not all have small leaves. Some have leaves 4 inches long.
Mike


 o
RE: shrub ID

Cotoneaster imo, too. Many species are plentiful and common here and they range from low shrubs to small trees. Leaves can be tiny and rounded up to long and narrow, as Mike says. Some are deciduous some evergreen.


 o
RE: shrub ID

Thank you all so much for the help. It's so good to have an identity for this plant after all these years, and I hope it will have better, more appropriate care now.


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Shrubs Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.


Learn more about in-text links on this page here