Return to the Soil Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
Food for Thought

Posted by toxcrusadr (My Page) on
Tue, Aug 2, 11 at 16:02

"History is largely a record of human struggle to wrest the land from nature, because man relies for sustenance on the products of the soil. So direct is the relationship between soil erosion, the productivity of the land, and the prosperity of people, that the history of mankind, to a considerable degree at least, may be interpreted in terms of the soil and what has happened to it as the result of human use."

Bennett and Lowdermilk
Early soil conservation pioneers
ca. 1930s


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: Food for Thought

You did not mention your source but I found a similar quote at : http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Soil

I like all of the quotes from Justin Isherwood much more, including:

"One of the great treasures of the world is to be found in the vast prairie soil covering parts of seven Midwest states together with a moderate climate and ample rainfall. Subtract these Midwest soils from the American experience and replace them with the drought-prone soils, and the course of our destiny and wealth might have been otherwise." ~ Justin Isherwood

Well, duh! - Although I like it, this quote and the Bennett/Lowdermilk quote have the same problem. If Isherwood had these thoughts *before* the midwest was known as the "breadbasket" it would have been much more of a revelation. Similarly, if the Bennett/ Lowdermilk quote had not occured *during or recently after* the "DUST BOWL" it would have been MUCH more important. People of the time definately knew what was happening after it was far too late!- as I gather did their officials.

The Isherwood quote would just affirm what everyone alive and conscious at the time (and now) knew to be fact. The Bennett/Lowdermilk quote would probably accomplish the same while being much more offensive because of their position/ineptness (is c.y.a. timeless?).

Perhaps soil erosion can be thought of differntly now than it was 70 years ago? Could there be new voices and current data? Is there any soil or arable land left, 70 years onward? Is that possible given the data they said was fact at the time?


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!


Return to the Soil Forum

Instructions

  • You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
  • HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
  • No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.



 
Click here to learn more about in-text links on this page.