JOIN NOW LOG IN
iVillage GardenWeb iVillage GardenWeb THE INTERNET'S GARDEN & HOME COMMUNITY ADVERTISEMENT
Blogs Forums Photo Galleries Ask The Experts Tools & Directories        
Return to the Gardening with Stone Forum | Post a Follow-Up

 o
3'6' retaining wall- drystack field stone, or versalok/Anchor

Posted by edmakeover (My Page) on
Tue, Mar 31, 09 at 20:17

I have a curving 50 ft long retaining wall to build. I did measurements, and I expect the wall to be about 3 ' from grade, with a small section creeping slightly over to about 3'6". There will be a slight slope downhill of the wall, though I will try to excavate at least a 12" flat "section" ahead of the front.

I'm torn between dry laid field stone or Segmented concrete block. This height seems to be close to the edge for dry laid, especially since this will be my first dry-laid project. I've built several timber retaining walls in the past. What is the most reliable method for a 1st timer? Appears I can get segmented concrete block for about $2000, which is more than I want to pay, so I'm leaning towards fieldstone. Looks are not critical since it's at the bottom of our rather deep backyard, but I much prefer the look of the stone.

My plan is to do stone, and compensate with an 18"X 18" deep trench filled with 12" quarry process, and put a full 6" of the first course (or 2) below grade. Planning on 18" base wall depth with 3"/ft batter, and some long stone "tie ins" about every 4 ft on each course. My whole backyard is sloped and drains well, so there are no unusual hydrostatic issues. I will take my time, but also recognize that I'm very far from a skilled mason. Should I do this, or punt and spend the extra money on the manmade concrete system?

If concrete system, any recommendations on most economical choice? Looks aren't critical, but ease of installation is. Appreciate any tips on which way to go.


:


Follow-Up Postings:

 o
RE: 3'6' retaining wall- drystack field stone, or versalok/Anchor

The 3"/ft batter or rake looks OK. The base wall thickness looks light, go with 24" bottom, 16" top. Better than 25,000 lb of stone; I hope you have a strong back.

SRW walls aren't a lot better for the back and require more skill to get them right.

But there aren't a lot of choices if you live in a cold climate. Down south we get to do poured concrete. Cheaper, faster, strong, and not so much hard labor.


 
 

 

 


Click here to learn more about in-text links on this page.



iVillage GardenWeb: The Internet's Garden & Home Community  
  iVillage Home & Garden Network