Return to the Tractors Forum
| Post a Follow-Up
John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
Posted by crazycanuck_2008 (My Page) on Thu, Jun 5, 08 at 15:20
| Other than the dealer service and the engine (both of which are of course important), can anybody create for me a list of physical attributes that make these units different?
I am not saying they are the same, I am curious what the differences are.
thanks
|
Follow-Up Postings:
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
| You can go to deere.com and click on "specifications" for both the LA115 and the X300 and click on the "Export to Excel" button. Line them up side by side in Excel and it should be easy to see all the differences. |
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
I did all the specs stuff the important things you won't find in the website. There a few BIG differences The 300 has a thicker frame Kawasaki engine vs briggs huge difference upgraded spindles and pulleys k46 tranny vs 115's tranny with nylon gears yes, nylon And quite a few other better and or beefer upgrades.There really is a big difference in mowers Trust me Its worth the extra 1000.00 |
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
| This is excellent. I didn't know you could export the specs. That is very helpful. I am particularly interested in items not mentioned in the specs sheet online (eg. frame thickness). Yikes .... nylon gears sounds nutty. Would these lesser quality items carry through the LA series. Is the LA165 any better for any of these items you listed jaws1959? thanks again folks. |
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
I am interested...correct me if I'm wrong. The LA 115, 125 and 135 use the T40 Tuff Torque transmission. No where can I find the "nylon" gears mentioned. Where did you find that information? Thanks, Jack |
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
| Jack you are correct the 115 thru the 135 has the T40 tranny. The La 165 is the starting point of the T46. That transmission is carried on the rest of the la series and into the X300 and now the X304 as of 2008. You have to go to a X320 to get a K58 Transmission. As far as the nylon gears the lead mechanic at my local J.D. dealer. As he refered to as PLASTIC gears on the 135 and below. Interestingly enough if you look at Tuff Torque specs on there website you will notice they no longer have the specs for the T40. The K46 has metal powder gears and the K58 has heat treated steel gears. So for a short answer the LA165 has the T46 but is basically LA. Thats why I went with the x300 Just pissed they downgraded the X304 otherwise I would have gone the 304. X300 is a great machine! |
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
Major Differences: Frame: 70lbs vs. 96lbs Turn Radius:18" vs. 16" Front Wheels: Bushings vs. Ball Bearings Engine: B&S vs. Kawa Hydro: K40 vs. K46 Tank: 2.1gal vs.3.5 Spindles to Mower: Self tapping screw vs. heavy duty bolt & nut PTO: Cable vs. electric Plus other minor upgrades such as steering wheel, seat, cutting adjusments. |
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
| I'm being nit-picky, but just to avoid some confusion for anyone new to the subject... The low end LA use a T40. The current X300 and X304 use a K46. I don't believe there is such as a thing as a K40 or a T46. Jaws1959... Tuff Torq lists the heat-treated powder metal gears for the K46. The K58 used in the current X320 tractors (and older X304s) is not listed on their site. Or I'm missing something. They do list the K57, which is probably similar. The K58 shows the heat-treated powder metal gears with steel gears being "optional". Have you seen something that confirms the use of steel gears in the K58? |
Here is a link that might be useful: K57 specs
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
| Ha! I went and screwed up the names of these, myself. That last part should read... "The K57 shows the heat-treated powder metal gears with steel gears being "optional". Have you seen something that confirms the use of steel gears in the K58?" |
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
| Holy cows guys. This is impressive information. Where are you guys getting it from? I am now down to the following decision. LA165 vs X300. I realize they are quite different machines but it still is a choice that makes sense for my potential applications. I would do some things with the bigger machine that I might not do with the smaller one and vise versa. I have 1/2 acre and lots of landscaping to do so I might use a tractor for some stuff or I might use my truck instead. I for sure am leaning towards the X300 but the price tag on the LA165 is pulling me toward it. Man, I am new to this but I can only imagine how many people before me have gone through similar self torture....but it's fun self torture. I appreciate all of this information folks. I will be making a decision soon and when I do make the purchase I will check in with you guys in 6 months and let you know how it went. SO ... if anybody is not yet tired of this thread, could they compare the LA165 to the X300. Whether anybody does or not, I will then stop pestering you guys and thank you again for your help. PS this is all information I would like to have in my little brain before I make a visit to my local dealer to make my final decision. I will be thanking you guys again when I get there. |
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
| This pretty much sums it up... "Repost of Slammer's Rules..... 1. Carefully evaluate the size mower you need and buy at least one size larger. 2. NEVER buy a mower from ANYPLACE that will not let you test drive it or at least a similar model. Ergonomics are just as important as performance and capability. (Vitally important!) 3. DO NOT base your purchase on price or brand name alone! Do proper research and find all of the available models that fit your criteria and haggle, save, or trade to get the right equipment for the job. Do not compromise! If you follow these three tips you will end up a happy camper with just the right unit for the job. If you disregard this advice your gonna end up with One or the other of the following problems: A. Buyers remorse. Stuck with a piece of junk or simply a unit inadequate for the task at hand. Or.. B. A teed off spouse when you start shopping for another tractor just 3 - 6 months down the road because you didn't buy the right unit in the first place". |
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
| Let me clear up a few things. Just went to the John Deere dealer today got on my hands and knees and looked at the La 165 and 175 both had the T 40 NOT the T 46 tranny. My mistake. Have been told by numerous people the T 46 was in the La165 and La175 They were wrong. There is a Tuff Torque identification sticker on every transmission easily displayed. The whole LA line has the T40. The X300 and the X304 Has the T46. I mixed the T with the K. It's T46 And K58. Varmint, the gears are optional metal powder or heat treated steel. One final Thing Canuck take justalurker's post to heart. The most important thing i've learned, get one step larger or stronger unit. You can never get more ruggedness or power from a piece of equiptment that does'nt have it if you need it. And because the unit doesn't have to work as hard they last exponentally longer. Good luck canuck. |
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
| "Other than the dealer service..." If you are still reading this, you can get the LA series at your dealer. It sounded a bit like Box Store (LA series) vs X300 (from dealer). If you decide on a LA series, I'd still go to the dealer. Have fun shopping! |
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
Nylon gears? I do not believe that. I called the mechanic at my dealership and he said no, it is not true. The T40 is not re-buildable but it does not use nylon, they use metal. It is so very easy for someone to disparage someone or something on the internet. Where is your proof? Post a picture or link with facts. Anyone can say anything on here that they wanted, to degrade. If you believe it you may be a fool. Check it, verify it, have proof. The LA series is one heck of a lawn tractor, standing tall amongst it's rivals. PROVE IT. |
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
| Hey johnny I only relayed what was told to me from what I would want to believe is a reputable source the shop forman of the repair center at my local John Deere Dealer. And as far as slamming the LA I considered other manufacturers in the same category when shopping for my tractor and think it is, except for the undersized transmission, superior! By the way so does consumer reports, But thats in its class. As far as the X series There is no comparison and THAT is what cunuck was asking the comparison between the two. By the way this is imho only. |
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
I am not looking for an arguement here but lets call a duck a duck. I disagree with your statement "undersized" transmission. The T40 tranny is NOT undersized in any way, shape or form, used for it's intended purpose. It is designed and built for a specific audience and it performs very well to that audience. As you say...in its class. As you also say...Consumer Reports also says so. People need a truck, BUY a truck. Need a "lawn" tractor, buy a GOOD "lawn" tractor and you will be happy for a long time. The LA 100 Series is a "lawn" tractor. |
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
| Johnny, I will have to totally agree with you. |
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
Well, thank you sir! It's not often one hears that. OK, have a great day, I'm off to buy another JD hat. |
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
| I believe the reason you've read posters writing about the K46 in the LA165 and LA175 is that Deere says that's what they have. Here's a link... LA Series Transaxles From my perspective, the LA165 and LA175 are just as capable as the X300. None of these mowers is going to do something the others can't. It's just a matter of refinement, comfort, durability and price. I believe the X300 owns the first three categories. On the other hand, the LA tracs win the price comparison. The only question is whether the buyer cares about refinement, comfort, and durability. If the answer is "no", price wins. As for the "buy more than you think you need" philosophy, it makes some sense for anyone buying their first tractor. That's because we tend to buy a machine, use it for a while, then discover all these other things a tractor could do if we'd just bought a beefier one! However, if you're confident you won't be finding more tasks for the trac, don't waste your money buying too much machine. You can always rent a dedicated machine for the occasional job that requires more than your trac can handle. |
RE: John Deere LA115 vs John Deere X300
| | |
| My 18 year old JD170 finally 'died'. Or so I told myself and my wife. :-) Actually, one of the spindles broke and everyone knows that a broken spindle can't be fixed. Right? So what's a guy to do (sob). What any guy would do -- I went and bought a brand new X300 which will be delivered in 2 days. I only cut a mostly flat 1/2 acre so the X300 is overkill but who cares! I do want to buy the snow blower attachment and figured the X300 will be excellent for that purpose. I really can't wait. By the way Jaws, the spec sheet says the X300 has the K46 transmission, not the T46. I didn't read this post until last night, so I didn't get down to look at the sticker. All the posts though just confirmed that I bought one great machine. I might bypass the RIO switch though as I didn't buy the 4WS and do back up quite a bit. My 170 still has a perfectly running Kawasaki 14HP engine and tranny. What a workhorse! I gave pause to look at the HuskVys and Cub Cadets, but my 170 made me a JD loyalist. It really gave me outstanding service and I wasn't one to take care of it much. Lacking a shed and garage space, I often left it out all year, including severe upstate NY winters. It always started right up in the spring. But rust (wonder how that happened), deteriorating bags (hmmmm), and faded paint (go figure) convinced me that it was time. Actually, the fact that my 10yo son will want to be cutting the lawn in a couple years had something to do with it. Figured I want a some time where it's just MY machine. Don't worry guys -- I promise to take care of my new machine. I'm 53, and want this machine to last me 20 years or more -- or until I get the itch for a new model, whichever comes first. JD did give me $250 for a trade-in on the 170. I might had got more for it if I wanted to fix the spindle, clean it up and put up for sale -- but that would take time away from my X300. I'll let you guys know how I like it. Who am I kidding... I'm going to Love it! |
Post a Follow-Up
Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum. If you are a member, please log in. If you aren't yet a member, join now!
Return to the Tractors Forum
|
|
|