|
| Hi, I need a little advice for choosing a tree to solve a garden problem.
I have a large garden bordered on one side by a tall (2-story) prunus laurocerasus hedge. It used to hide my neighbor's barn, but now he's gone and put up a taller barn with a shiny metal roof that sticks up over the hedge. It's directly opposite a seating area on the other side of my garden, and in the morning there's a fierce glare from the roof which is really distracting. I was planning to put some sort of focal point in that spot anyway -- right now it's just a big expanse of lawn next to the hedge. It seems to me that I need a big fast-growing deciduous tree to block the glare, distract from the roof, and break up the blank space. And then I can make a new seating area in the shade below. I've thought of hornbeam, red maple, chestnut, or walnut. I was wondering whether I should be concerned about allelopathy of the laurel hedge? For what it's worth, there are perfectly healthy cherry and ash trees growing next to one end of the hedge. Anybody have any thoughts?
|
Follow-Up Postings:
|
| And the location? According to your profile you are in the Netherlands. Is that still accurate? |
|
- Posted by gardengal48 PNW zone 8 (My Page) on Tue, Apr 3, 12 at 14:02
| Are you concerned the laurel hedge may be allelopathic? It's not. If that is what is limiting your your selection, you should have no hesitations. |
|
- Posted by purplepoppy 6 (My Page) on Tue, Apr 3, 12 at 15:35
| Yes, esh_ga, I'm in the Netherlands, in a relatively cold inland area. It's a zone 6 on the map, but I think it's more 5-ish. Yes, I was concerned that the laurel hedge was allelopathic; I'd read conflicting reports on this. But certainly, I do see a lot of healthy trees growing next to laurel hedges, so perhaps I don't need to worry. Whatever I plant, it's going to look pretty puny for a few years next to that monster hedge. (Which I wouldn't get rid of for the world, what with the barn and all.)
|
|
- Posted by gardengal48 PNW zone 8 (My Page) on Tue, Apr 3, 12 at 16:20
| According to a listing of allelopathic species from the U of Georgia, Prunus laurocerasus is not considered to be allelopathic. The leaves, seeds and twigs do contain some toxic properties (glycosides and amygdalin), but I'd suspect those pertain more to creatures that might consume these parts than to a true allelopathy. Oddly, this shrub is now borderline invasive in much of my area simply because the "toxic" seeds are spread so easily by birds :-)) |
|
- Posted by purplepoppy 6 (My Page) on Thu, Apr 5, 12 at 14:25
| Thanks for the advice, everybody. I have the feeling gardengal48 knows what she's talking about. |
Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum. If you are a member, please log in. If you aren't yet a member, join now!
Return to the Trees Forum
Instructions
- You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
- Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
- After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
- It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
- HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
- No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
- If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
- If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.