Return to the Trees Forum | Post a Follow-Up

Birch tree stump new growth

Posted by chris_rb 5 / NH (My Page) on
Sat, May 2, 09 at 9:43

We cut down a birch tree in 2007 and never removed the stump. Now there are shoots growing around the circumference of the stump.

My question is, do you think we can successfully grow a new tree by selecting one of these shoots and cutting the rest?


Follow-Up Postings:

RE: Birch tree stump new growth

Often the connection between the new growth and the stump is weak. Also, the stump will rot, and although the new growth will compartmentalize against this, the scenerio is not good. To answer your question, yes, you can let ALL suckers grow for a season and pick the strongest. However, a sucker coming from a dead stump is hardly the best idea for a new tree.

RE: Birch tree stump new growth

do you think we can successfully grow a new tree by selecting one of these shoots and cutting the rest?

Maybe. But you don't want to bet on it, as hortster said.


RE: Birch tree stump new growth

I see questions about stump sprouts fairly often in this forum--it is an important and interesting issue. I have had a lot of experience with trees from stump sprout origin, and have read a number of silvicultural articles about it. Here are some important points.

First, different species of trees have different potentials for successful stump sprout regeneration. With some species, such as black cherry, stump sprouts are almost universally successful, and often result in magnificent trees, strong, vigorous, and basically as good as trees of seedling origin. Other kinds of trees are a bit more "iffy," such as red maple. But even red maple stump sprouts can result in good trees.

I really don't have any information about birch trees, and it may make a difference which kind of birch you have.

But here are some general guidelines. First, for the first year, leave all the sprouts to grow. It looks like you are in the second year now, so here is what you should do. Remove all the sprouts that are near the top of the stump--those near where the point where the tree was cut off. Remove these even if some of them seem to be the most vigorous. Next, look for those that are lowest on the stump. Any that are growing at or just above the root collar, if you can identify that, are those that have the best potential. If any of these are among the most vigorous, and come out from the stump fairly straight, these are your best potential trees. If you can find anywhere from two to as many as five of these, leave them all for now. But, if any two or more of these "best sprouts" are growing close to each other--within 3 inches or so--remove all but one from each group/pair. Now remove all the other sprouts.

Next year you can remove all but the best two or three. Then you can decide if you want a clump of more than one tree or just one. If you want just one, wait one more year, and then remove all but the one that seems to be the strongest. If one is lower on the stump--closer to the root collar--that should get some priority, unless some other one that is nearly as low seems clearly more vigorous.

If you do these things--and have sprouts at or near the root collar--your chances of getting a really good new tree this way are very high. Stump sprout trees do not necessarily have the rot from the stump migrate into the new tree--ever--especially if they grow from a point very near the root collar. And, although they can easily be broken off when they are very young, later these trees can be very strong and are not more likely to break than other trees.

Good luck!


RE: Birch tree stump new growth

I generally agree with spruce and find their advice excellent, but not all trees stump sprout.

Birch are a ruderal spp and stump sprout to the extent that they will do so successfully when conditions allow and the stump sprouting has a chance to ensure fruiting. This fact is key about your tree: birch are not a long-lived spp. If you wish to expend time, energy and money to try and ensure a short-lived tree resprouts for 15-20 years, that is intersesting but not logical. Replace with a long-lived seral tree.


 o Post a Follow-Up

Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum.

    If you are a member, please log in.

    If you aren't yet a member, join now!

Return to the Trees Forum

Information about Posting

  • You must be logged in to post a message. Once you are logged in, a posting window will appear at the bottom of the messages. If you are not a member, please register for an account.
  • Please review our Rules of Play before posting.
  • Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review your post, make changes and upload photos.
  • After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
  • Before posting copyrighted material, please read about Copyright and Fair Use.
  • We have a strict no-advertising policy!
  • If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
  • If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.

Learn more about in-text links on this page here