|
| I live in a NE suburb of Detroit, Michigan. We have a 35+ foot tall Maple Tree that was damanged in a recent high wind/tornado(?). I'd like to save this tree as it is still beautiful, provides plenty of shade, and cannot afford to have it taken down. I've read and heard of Tar to seal the wound, pesticided and fungicides, filling the trunk in with cement so the bark has something to heal and grow back over. One tree sepcialist said to remove existing much and rocks, extend the mulch bed to the drip line, then use composted mulch to the dripline, keeping it 6 inches from base of tree, then soaking the dripline area once per week for 1/2 hours. Many conflicting ideas and advise. Anyone know for sure the best way for me to save this tree? Thank you!! |
Follow-Up Postings:
|
| Ugh. Don't put anything on the wound, you will only make things worse. Hate to tell ya, but a wound that big is unlikely to heal on its own, certainly not before rot sets in in a big way. The tree itself might live for a good while like that, but eventually it will keel over in a storm. |
|
- Posted by ken_adrian z5 (My Page) on Tue, Jul 10, 12 at 8:48
| I've read and heard of Tar to seal the wound, pesticided and fungicides, filling the trunk in with cement so the bark has something to heal and grow back over. ===>>> nearly everything in that comment is wrong ... some do talk of pesticides and fungicides.. but IMHO maple in MI [livonia bred.. adrian now] ... do not need any of that ... and your local guy.. really wants to make some money off you ... probably a boat payment.. lol .. frankly.. its got to go .. i fully understand budget problem .. but plan to be done with it inside 5 years ... if you can actually look at it that long ... it will not heal.. before the rot starts.. IMHO ... the problem.. if you care to look it up.. was improper crotch angles leading to included bark [see link] .. which made a weak point .. if you look close at that VEE ... you will see where bark was inside the crotch angle.. and with the storm pressure.. it just failed ... and the branch just above the VEE.. is no better.. and will be the next to fail ... some day in the future ... this tree is a nightmare.. but again.. think in terms of a tree life span of 60 to 100 years .. and there is no hurry to remove ... UNLESS it is a threat to your home.. which it does NOT appear from this pic.. ken |
Here is a link that might be useful: flip to the SEARCH side for info
|
| Hard to tell if it's a red or silver maple -- lean toward red. Either way, the wood's not durable. Still, you'd be surprised how quickly scar tissue will form. The rate it will decay is related to how dry or wet the exposed wood will be -- dryer means slowed decay. Some trimming off of the broken-wood remnants at the very bottom would be a good idea, but careful not to make the edge of the wound worse. |
|
| I think I would try to save it with conditions. We had an ash tree about 30" at the base that was hit by lightning. It looked like it had hit the huge branch and broken it off. It then ran down the tree a few feet and jumped to the mail box and literally disintegrated it. Since it is a clean split with the grain of your tree, I think I would try to save it. However based on my experience with the ash, I would wait a few months before I made any decision. While the initial loss of bark was a couple of inches just where the lightning went down the ash, after I few months I realize that the inner bark was fried, and the bark on half the circumference of the tree was loose and falling off. The tree could not survive with the the loss of half the bark. |
|
| Well, if it's not a safety hazard, you could certainly experiment with it and see what happens. But to me, that is pretty bad. I'm usually an advocate of trying to save them if they can be saved, but I don't know. Also, with such a major portion of the tree gone, how is the tree cosmetically? Pretty lopsided now I would guess. I don't know about this one, I think if it were me I'd be on the phone to the tree service and move on. |
|
| Well, if it's not a safety hazard, you could certainly experiment with it and see what happens. But to me, that is pretty bad. I'm usually an advocate of trying to save them if they can be saved, but I don't know. Also, with such a major portion of the tree gone, how is the tree cosmetically? Pretty lopsided now I would guess. I don't know about this one, I think if it were me I'd be on the phone to the tree service and move on. |
Please Note: Only registered members are able to post messages to this forum. If you are a member, please log in. If you aren't yet a member, join now!
Return to the Trees Forum
Instructions
- You must be a registered member and logged in to post messages on our forums.
- Posting is a two-step process. Once you have composed your message, you will be taken to the preview page. You will then have a chance to review the contents and make changes.
- After posting your message, you may need to refresh the forum page in order to see it.
- It is illegal to post copyrighted material without the owner's consent.
- HTML codes are allowed in the message field only.
- No advertising is allowed in any of the forums.
- If you would like to practice posting or uploading photos, please visit our Test forum.
- If you need assistance, please Contact Us and we will be happy to help.